ontolog-tool-survey-1

["Bob Smith" <robsmith5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Leo,

 

The "Submit" button seemed to be ontologically stuck...

 

Thanks,

 

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ontology_site22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ontology_site22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter P. Yim
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:27 AM
To: ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog] ontology tools and an ontology repository?

ontolog-tool-survey-1

From:    "Leo Obrst"
To:     ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Sent:     Wednesday, November 13, 2002 05:19
Subject:    [ontolog] ontology tools and an ontology repository?
Source:    http://ontolog.cim3.org/forums/ontolog/0211/msg00008.html

We are considering one possibility for our site: an ontology repository,
wherein folks can register ontologies and/or build ontologies using
Web-enabled tools, possibly hosted at our site.

So some questions:

1. How do you feel about:
our site supporting an ontology repository?

Yes No

our site supporting a Web-enabled ontology tool (for developing ontologies)?

Yes No

none of the above.

Not a good idea, because

Which ontology tools do you use?

Ontology tool I use/am familiar with

Can you characterize the tools: i.e., Web-enabled, ontology
languages supported, cost/licensing, POCs, experience, etc.

Do you know of a tool provider who might support such a public
effort, hosted on our site?

Candidate provider

Which ontology languages (knowledge representation languages) should
be the standard(s) for the ontologies?
(Some examples: Ontolingua/KIF, Common Logic, OKBC, CycL, RDF/S,
DAML+OIL, OWL, etc.)

Additional Comments?

My E-mail address is

This online questionnaire was developed by Peter Yim based on Leo Obrst's original posting. E-mail them if there is any question.

ATT00007.txt
Description: Text document