point I would have made): it isn't that
the 3 of us need to talk with
each other, nor with the public or the media, so much as with the rest
of you, this group. I.e., we've got decades of actual experiences
that we can share with you. Many of you (academics and vendors alike)
are new to this field, and we can tell you some of the lessons we
the hard way, what surprised us (e.g., which "details" end up being
and which "crucial issues" end up not being critical after all), what
existing ontologies ARE (as resources for the community) in at least
more than several seconds' detail, etc.
Is that what you were getting at, Adam?