uom-ontology-std
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [uom-ontology-std] What is mass?

To: uom-ontology-std <uom-ontology-std@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:37:56 -0500
Message-id: <AB636FEE-18DE-4A88-8C1A-A7BF9EB9DB05@xxxxxxx>

On Sep 29, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Gunther Schadow wrote:    (01)

> Matthew West wrote:
>> Dear Ingvar,
>>
>> This sounds like an interesting challenge.
>>
>>> I am as aware of the contents of VIM as of the SI brochure, and
>>> your
>>> "n.b." makes exactly my point. What you might call "newton-meter as
>>> a unit
>>> alone", I prefer to call "nominal newton-meter". However, note that
>>> only
>>> some units can be called nominal units and tied to more than one
>>> kind-of-quantity; many units are unambiguously tied only to one
>>> kind-of-quantity.
>>
>> Could you give me a unit (or two) that you think only applies to one
>> kind-of-quantity, and I'll see if I can identify another?
>>
>> Engineering is full of things like Maximum Allowable Working
>> Temperature, which is certainly not a temperature (try measuring it  
>> with
>> a thermometer).
>
>
> Why is maximum allowable temperature not a temperature?    (02)

It is a temperature. But its not the temperature OF anything (we hope,  
if things are working right.) That is, there is nothing which has that  
temperature. In Matthew's overarching ontological framework, that  
might mean it doesn't exist (? Matthew, sorry if I get this wrong.)    (03)

> Just because
> it isn't realized? It is a temperature specification. It is a quantity
> even if it doesn't exist anywhere at any particular moment in time.    (04)

I tend to agree. Quantities (as opposed to things that have them)  
should probably be viewed in a Platonic light in any case, like  
numbers, so they don't actually have places and moments to exist in.  
Even for the most case-hardened nominalists (among which I count  
myself), it isn't practical to try to get along without some  
abstractions in the universe of discourse.    (05)

Pat H.    (06)

>
> But of course that is another issue and I still agree that a maximum
> allowable temperature of this machine can not be well compared with
> the water temperature of my pool -- but then they can if the machine
> is meant to go into my pool (which I don't have)
>
> -Gunther
>
>
> -- 
> Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D.                  gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Associate Professor           Indiana University School of Informatics
> Regenstrief Institute, Inc.      Indiana University School of Medicine
> tel:1(317)423-5521                       http://aurora.regenstrief.org
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
> Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard
>
>    (07)

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (08)






_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/  
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>