Mike & Rex, (01)
I agree that would be a good idea* ... but, "No!" there has not been
further takes on the matter beyond, (02)
(a) a general consensus at OntologySummit2008 to use (or extend) OMV
(ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2008_04_10#nid1D3Q
) ... and, (03)
(b) discussion at the "OOR Use Cases - Take-3" session of 1-Apr-2010
(ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2010_04_01
) when the NEU team (Baclawski-Gurmendez) suggest the use of their
UCDO (Use Cases Description Ontology) to drive OOR "gatekeeping." (04)
... *to realize any idea or suggestion, the easiest way is to propose
something (implementable), get input/feedback from the OOR-team, and
then go ahead and get it implemented and contribute that to the OOR
effort. (05)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (06)
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mike Bennett <mbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Talking of which, has anyone had any more thoughts about whether or how
> one might register ontologies which, while built on known ontology
> formats (e.g. OWL) are implemented on tools such as UML repositories
> (e.g. via ODM or extensions thereof)? I haven't been able to make recent
> sessions but this came up at the SemTech presentation.
>
> In the context of this, I very much support the idea mooted by Rex
> Brooks in the adjacent thread, about having some way of identifying the
> extent to which good practice has been used in modeling in OWL (for
> example), I'm not advocating being able to simply put a UML repository
> file up there on the basis that someone says it's really an ontology. I
> don't think it will be a trivial job to figure out those quality
> measures though.
>
> Mike (07)
> Peter Yim wrote:
>> That's BioPortal ... (not OOR!)
>>
>> Being an open community project, OOR is what the OOR-team will make it into.
>>
>> Regards. =ppy
>> -- (08)
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been reviewing the BioPortal documentation in preparation for the
>>> CL/OOR discussion. Page 4 of the BioPortal Architecture Roadmap states
>>> that "In Year Five, we will complete the transition to a unified RDF Triple
>>> Store for all the artifacts stored in BioPortal". How do we store CL
>>> content within a triple store?
>>> see
>https://bmir-gforge.stanford.edu/gf/download/docmanfileversion/272/391/NCBOArchitectureRoadmapReport20080424_FINAL.pdf.
>>> Cameron.
>>> --
>>> Kojeware Corporation
>>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mike Bennett
> Director
> Hypercube Ltd.
> 89 Worship Street
> London EC2A 2BF
> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7917 9522
> Mob: +44 (0) 7721 420 730
> www.hypercube.co.uk
> Registered in England and Wales No. 2461068
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
> (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (010)
|