Concur. (01)
Cheers,
Rex (02)
At 8:13 PM -0800 1/23/08, Peter Yim wrote:
>I concur, Lee. In fact, I was hoping we would have come to closure on
>this at the call today (but unfortunately, we did not.)
>
>Since we only had 12 people on the call (out of the 38 that are
>subscribed to the list), it does help to get buyin from the entire
>team. If we don't have further objections (which I hope we don't) we
>could just summarily adopt the definition that the meeting
>participants came up with today.
>
>Thanks & regards. =ppy
>--
>
>
>On Jan 23, 2008 10:08 PM EST, Lee Feigenbaum
><lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Peter Yim wrote Jan 23, 2008 12:02 PM PST:
>> >> In particular, were made an attempt (and came close) to adopting
>> >> a definition for "ontology repository" (possibly even "ontology
>> >> registry"), but decided to put this up for asynchronous discussion
>> >> deliberation due to time constraints.
>> >
>> > Ref.
>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR/ConferenceCall_2008_01_23#nid17US
>> >
>> > We were close ... (and have got to):
>> >
>> > "An ontology repository is a facility where ontologies and related
>> > information artifacts can be stored, retrieved and managed."
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I find this definition perfectly acceptable.
>
>> > Let's open this up for discussion and then put it to a vote after 7
>> > calendar days (from the time-stamp of this message).
>> >
>> > Feel free to attempt defining "ontology registry" or "registry" too.
>> > If we are getting close, we'll adopt that as well.
>
>> While I found the discussion today quite interesting, I'm not sure how
>> important it is to our going forward to define registry or ontology
>> registry itself. I think there was a consensus understanding in general
>> of the distinction between a repository and a registry -- if we agree on
>> a definition for a repository (which is our end goal, if I understand
>> the project correctly :-), then perhaps we do not need to belabor a
>> definition of ontology registry as well?
>>
>> Lee
>
>[ppy] I concur, Lee. In fact, I was hoping we would have come to
>closure on this at the call today (but unfortunately, we did not.)
>
>Since we only had 12 people on the call (out of the 38 that are
>subscribed to the list), it does help to get buyin from the entire
>team. If we don't have further objections (which I hope we don't) we
>could just summarily adopt the definition that the meeting
>participants came up with today.
>
>Thanks & regards. =ppy
>--
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (03)
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670 (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (05)
|