I added to the community input wiki page, but here are some teasers to
start discussion. See the wiki page for full context. (01)
"We should distinguish at least 5 stakeholder groups with different
interests in big systems: designers, analysts, builders, users, and
theorists."
(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012_BigSystemsEngineering_CommunityInput#nid353O) (02)
"Theorists are usually the least relevant players in big systems, and
the most likely to be wrong about them."
(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012_BigSystemsEngineering_CommunityInput#nid353P) (03)
"It seems clear that no single ontology can simultaneously satisfy the
needs of designers, analysts, builders, and users of a big system."
(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012_BigSystemsEngineering_CommunityInput#nid353R) (04)
Regards,
--Paul (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (06)
|