[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] System Components

To: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Matthew K. Hettinger" <mkhettinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:13:50 -0600
Message-id: <4F26EBEE.7050105@xxxxxxxxxx>

I would like to look at your concept map, because as you know, I've done a lot of work mapping semiotics to systemics (and vice versa).
Can you give me the number of the issue in which it was sent?

I would rephrase "the difference between a model of X as expressed in a language vs. the actual X as expressed
in technology(ies)" by  .............. the actual/concrete X as *realized* in technologies.

"How shall an ontology indicate multiple interpretants and the conditions for which path to take?"

Probably not a single ontology, but a collection of mapped ontologies. One also needs to take into consideration the interpreter, the interpretations, made by the interpreter, the context in which the interpreters are embedded in, the contexts in which the languages
are embedded in, and the contexts in which the world if interest is embedded in. I'm not sure ontology can do it all

Matthew K. Hettinger

Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>