Dear John, (01)
> I realize that a large number of messages have gone back and forth
> about the word 'engineered'. But would anybody who reads the
> announcement of the ontology summit need to know any of that?
>
> > Track 2 will focus on the ontology of large-scale engineered systems.
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler just to drop the word 'engineered'? (02)
Not really my choice of words. The titles were settled before I offered to
be a champion. However, there is a distinction between systems in general
and engineered systems. Engineered systems are those that are the result of
some systems engineering process, whereas there are certainly systems that
arise naturally, and were not engineered for a purpose - at least not by
humans. (03)
If there was a strong interest expressed in systems that are wider than
engineered systems, I would be happy to broaden the track to accommodate
them. On the other hand, engineered systems are generally within my
competence, whereas a broader view of systems would not be, and I'd rather
not be drawing conclusions about systems in general when they really only
applied to engineered systems. (04)
So I suggest we await an interest and expertise in non-engineered systems
before making changes. (05)
Regards (06)
Matthew West
Information Junction
Tel: +44 1489 880185
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
Skype: dr.matthew.west
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/ (07)
This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE. (08)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontology-summit-org-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontology-summit-
> org-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F. Sowa
> Sent: 19 January 2012 13:42
> To: ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit-org] Track Content pages
>
> Dear Matthew,
>
> I realize that a large number of messages have gone back and forth
> about the word 'engineered'. But would anybody who reads the
> announcement of the ontology summit need to know any of that?
>
> > Track 2 will focus on the ontology of large-scale engineered systems.
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler just to drop the word 'engineered'?
>
> Is anything gained by that word, other than a puzzled look
> on somebody's face who wonders what meaning, if any, that word
> might contribute?
>
> John
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> To Post: mailto:ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Msg Archives: http://interop.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-org/
> Community Files: http://interop.cim3.net/file/work/ontology-summit-
> org/OntologySummit2012/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012 (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (010)
|