|To:||Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Ali Hashemi <ali@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:16:56 -0500|
A quick point,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Matthew West <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Many aspects of urban planning or other design work in large scale systems aren't necessarily the result of an explicit systems engineering process. From what I could tell, engineered was being used in the looser sense of something done with skill. I would suggest perhaps large-scale designed systems, or John's suggestion. I'll repeat in the other list as well.
Designed systems seems more apt than the more technical engineered systems...
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] [ontology-summit-org] Track Content pages, Matthew West|
|Next by Date:||[ontology-summit] Large-scale engineered systems vs. large-scale sociotechnical systems, Nicola Guarino|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] [ontology-summit-org] Track Content pages, Matthew West|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] [ontology-summit-org] Track Content pages, AzamatAbdoullaev|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|