Re: [ontology-summit] Thanks to all for a very successful Ontology Summi

[Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx>]

Here is a good example of the need for a location where users can note results, pro and con, of using the (v.1) communique. Or do you intend that this list be the place?

It is important to capture whether the data is the opinion of the 'ontologist' vs. the opinion of the 'prospect.'

On Apr 28, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:

This whole section should be removed from the communique.

The points are contentious and likely to result in people who have funding control being turned off

The communique is supposed to represent the thoughts of the collective and throwing in individual observations is probably not a good thing.

Point 1:
No one wants to invest in a technology that is a decade or 2 from being relevant. This is not likely even true.
Point 2:
Who cares what benefits machines get.
Point 3:
Why start a war with the guys that control the IT infrastructure? This statement is a highly contentious generalization and probably not defensible and is only going to piss off the people with whom we need to cooperate in order to get anything done.
It will be used as evidence that the group has no understanding of IT and business.

Ron

Ontology is a new paradigm.    (2T0D)

We believe that a new paradigm is emerging that will take a decade or two to become mainstream. This is illustrated by the following quotes from the summit participants.    (2T0E)

"Ontology does for machines what the World Wide Web did for people."    (2T0F)

"Ontology promises to be the driver for the next paradigm shift. If you think personal computing, and the Internet have been disruptive, wait and see what Ontology can bring about."    (2T0G)

"Everything in IT up till now has been about technology first and business a distant second. But semantic and ontological technology are different - there are explicitly, fluidly and directly about the core of our business - which is the work of our business. No other technology has ever really been primarily about the work of business."    (2T0H)

On 28/04/2011 11:36 AM, AzamatAbdoullaev wrote:

"So please, everyone, read over the Communique, and if you agree with it, please endorse it."

 

It looks we have here a complete endorsment campaign :-).

Trusting that the Communique should have its maximum supporters, i asked Steve of the following:

"Steve,

Somehow i missed its creation (and possibly many others).

Just wonder if its key theses are  cast-iron, and the content could be only endorsed.

I am ready to support all the good works done, but the Communique could be bettered in regard of its content and political publicity."

The answer is still pending...

Thanks

Azamat Abdoullaev  

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Obrst, Leo J.

To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:56 PM

Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Thanks to all for a very successful Ontology Summit 2011 Symposium! [AND Endorse the Communique, Please!]

Yes, indeed, Michael! In fact, in the past many of our Communique endorsers could not participate in the Symposium, and some not in the Summit. But they read the Communique and agreed to endorse.

 

So please, everyone, read over the Communique, and if you agree with it, please endorse it.

 

 

Thanks much,

Leo

 

_____________________________________________

Dr. Leo Obrst        The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics

lobrst@xxxxxxxxx     Information Discovery & Understanding, Command & Control Center

Voice: 703-983-6770  7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305

Fax: 703-983-1379    McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA

 

 

From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael F Uschold
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 10:42 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Thanks to all for a very successful Ontology Summit 2011 Symposium! [AND Endorse the Communique, Please!]

 

Leo,

 

Can someone endorse the communique if they had nothing to do with it, but they see and agree with it?

 

Michael 

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Obrst, Leo J. <lobrst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

All,

 

May we suggest to you all that you visit the communiqué and then register your endorsement? This includes all the editors, track champions, contributors over the past 3 months, and participants in the symposium, and your bases.

 

See the Communique at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique.

 

Express your endorsement by please emailing <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> with the statement "I endorse the Ontology Summit 2011 Communiqué (v1.0)" to confirm your endorsement.

 

Thanks!

Leo

_____________________________________________

Dr. Leo Obrst        The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics

lobrst@xxxxxxxxx     Information Discovery & Understanding, Command & Control Center

Voice: 703-983-6770  7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305

Fax: 703-983-1379    McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA

 

 

From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Obrst, Leo J.
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:29 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion (ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [ontology-summit] Thanks to all for a very successful Ontology Summit 2011 Symposium!

 

All,

 

Ram and I would like to thank everyone who contributed to making the Ontology Summit 2011 Symposium such a great success this year.

 

1) Thanks to the Lead Editors of the Communique (which is now available and ready to be endorsed by those who were not physically present at NIST yesterday) and the co-champions of individual Tracks.

 

Lead Editors of the Communique:  MichaelUschold, JohnBateman, MillsDavis, JohnSowa.

 

Co-Champions of the Tracks:

Track 1 Ontology Usage Framework: MichaelGruninger, MichaelUschold, NicolaGuarino

Track 2: Applications and Case Studies: MillsDavis, MikeBennett

Track 3: Value Metrics, Value Models and the Value Proposition: ToddSchneider, RexBrooks

Track 4: Strategies for "Making the Case": MatthewWest, PeterYim

Track 5: Grand Challenges: RamSriram, ErnieLucier, AldenDima.

 

2) Thanks to our excellent panelists: GeorgeStrawn, GeorgeThomas, DennisWisnosky, BillAndersen, MichaelGruninger, NicolaGuarino.

 

3) Thanks also to the General Chairs: NicolaGuarino and SteveRay.

 

4) Thanks also to Ontolog/CIM3 infrastructure support: PeterYim.

 

5) Thanks to NIST management, and NIST on-site and behind-the-scenes administration and facilities support: CitaFurlani, Mark Carlisle, and Janet Madison.

 

6) Thanks to our post-session contributors and organizers: DougSkuce, JohnSowa.

 

7) Thanks to all of our Ontology Summit 2011 contributors and Ontology Summit 2011 Symposium participants: you know who you are, and so do we.

 

8) Finally, thanks to all who we might have inadvertently missed thanking above.

 

Peter will shortly be posting links to the updated Communique, the proposed Ontology Summit 2011 Post-Mortem telecon, and other relevant links.

 

Thanks!

Ram and Leo

 

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

--
Michael Uschold, PhD
   Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts

   LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
   Skype, Twitter: UscholdM

 

---

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

 
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)