Great - glad they were helpful
________________________________________
From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael F Uschold
[uschold@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 6:52 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Official Communique Feedback Thread (01)
Thanks very much, excellent feedback. I made virtually all your suggested
changes. (02)
Michael (03)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:44 PM, MacPherson, Deborah
<dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Comments (04)
There are two periods at
(2S6D)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S6D> (05)
__________________ (06)
making the case to a variety of stakeholders.
(2S6F)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S6F> (07)
and several sentences below that also refer to stakeholders - (08)
If the pitch is being given these are not stakeholders yet, they have not
invested anything yet. However, they could benefit and become stakeholders in
the future. Could the first sentence change to "....potential beneficiaries
and future stakeholders". (09)
There are a number of sentences below where "stakeholder" is not always
necessary (010)
__________________
They provide a set of common problems that ontologies can be used to solve and
value propositions. (011)
in
(2S6X)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S6X> (012)
__________________ (013)
A fourth track was devoted to exploring longer term idea that may require
further research, but which is feasible nevertheless. This was the Grand
Challenges<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_GrandChallenges_Synthesis>
track (led by RamSriram<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?RamSriram>,
ErnieLucier<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ErnieLucier> and
AldenDima<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AldenDima>).
(2S70)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S70> (014)
__________________
Finally, there was an over-arching track for
Strategy<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_MakingTheCase_Synthesis>
(championed by
MatthewWest<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MatthewWest> and
PeterYim<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PeterYim>). How to put
together all the materials gathered and present them in the most effective way
to the appropriate stakeholder? I highlight Two of the results can be
highlighted that emerged from this track. First, the realization that.... (015)
in
(2S71)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S71> (016)
__________________ (017)
"Ontology does for machines what the World Wide Web did for people."
SteveRay<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SteveRay>
(2S73)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S73>
And a few other quotes below should all be italic and attributed (018)
__________________
In summary there were 5 tracks: Case Studies, Ontology Usage Framework, Value
Metrics, Strategy and Grand Challenges.
Needs to match the order of the 5 tracks as listed above with Strategy last (or
reorder above) (019)
__________________ (020)
In the rest of the communique, we will highlight some of the more important
conclusions from the tracks and email discussions. This will also elaborate a
bit more on the four main themes above. In doing so, some of the tracks will be
touched on more than others. Please refer to the track links for further
information.
(2S7A)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S7A>
Either strike "four main" and just say themes, or change to five tracks (021)
__________________ (022)
* Apply machine-learning, data-mining and other scale-based automatic
techniques for the semantic document processing and advanced analytics in
fields such as law, medicine, science, defense, and intelligence
(2S7I)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S7I>
Listing the fields may be limiting.
Or, can healthcare or something in the humanities be added for a broader
spectrum? (023)
__________________ (024)
Fundamentally, ontology is about reaching agreements on what things mean in
machine processable form. (025)
in
(2S7U)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S7U> (026)
__________________ (027)
When no-one knows on what anything means and there are so many systems that are
in production, (028)
the key to enabling a company an organization of any size to do the same things
more efficiently (029)
in
(2S7V)<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft#nid2S7V> (030)
__________________
Finally, attached is from a separate thread about whether or not the fire
fighters case study is using ontologies (031)
DEBORAH MACPHERSON, CSI CCS, AIA
Specifications and Research (032)
Cannon Design
1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 2900
Arlington, Virginia 22209 (033)
Direct Line 703 907 2353<tel:703%20907%202353>
4 Digit Dial 6353 (034)
dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cannondesign.com<http://cannondesign.com> (035)
ü Please consider the environment before printing this email. (036)
From:
ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (037)
[mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
On Behalf Of Michael F Uschold
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:26 AM (038)
To: Ontology Summit
Subject: [ontology-summit] Official Communique Feedback Thread (039)
Everyone, (040)
Please use this email thread for all feedback on the communique. Anything
submitted elsewhere risks not being addressed. If you have already submitted
feedback, I will greatly appreciate if you can take a moment and re-send it on
this thread using the subject. (041)
Many thanks. (042)
DETAILS:
There is now a snapshot of the draft Communique on the wiki for public review
and comment. (043)
See: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011_Communique/Draft (044)
The evolving draft Communique is
at:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z1oyuFxRfhJrzaEcORPT5hWfQqP36uzz7mn8GG-sxDM/edit?hl=en&authkey=CO-n3oEN (045)
Please refer to the process described in:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2011-04/msg00092.html to progress
this document to its final release.
Michael (046)
--
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM (047)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe:
mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (048)
--
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM (049)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (050)
|