It’s looking really good. Some specific suggestions:
1. I strongly endorse the use of links where you have highlighted the words “Case Studies”, “Ontology Usage Framework”, etc. They should point straight to the relevant synthesis page on the wiki.
2. One aspect of the Usage Framework is as a guide to help an ontologist find the most similar applications to one’s own. In this context, a user isn’t as interested in understanding the totality of applications as in finding material that can help his own advocacy.
Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
Distinguished Research Fellow
Carnegie Mellon University
NASA Research Park
Building 23 (MS 23-11)
P.O. Box 1
Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
Phone: (650) 587-3780
Cell: (202) 316-6481
From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael F Uschold
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:26 AM
To: Ontology Summit
Subject: [ontology-summit] Official Communique Feedback Thread
Please use this email thread for all feedback on the communique. Anything submitted elsewhere risks not being addressed. If you have already submitted feedback, I will greatly appreciate if you can take a moment and re-send it on this thread using the subject.
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts