On 12/14/2010 10:27 AM, Aldo Gangemi wrote:
> Strange as you may think, ontology design is not yet "obvious" and
> quietly accepted when discussing semantic applications, let alone a
> vague "ontology" discipline (01)
That's not strange at all. Most programmers (including many computer
scientists) are not convinced that ontologies are useful, and even
many who think that they might be useful have no idea where to start. (02)
As I said before, if you look at many OWL ontologies (including BFO),
you won't find anything that goes beyond Aristotle's syllogisms. (03)
John (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (05)
|