ontologizing
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontologizing] Re: [TaxoThesaurus] Ontolog Wiki Inventory

To: "'Ontologizing-Ontolog'" <ontologizing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Bob Smith" <Bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:34:35 -0700
Message-id: <200605151734.k4FHYZdc017521@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,    (01)

Yes, and after a few steps we can get some feedback from others, perhaps?    (02)

Cheers,    (03)

Bob     (04)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontologizing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontologizing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:40 AM
To: Ontologizing-Ontolog
Subject: Re: [ontologizing] Re: [TaxoThesaurus] Ontolog Wiki Inventory    (05)

Peter,    (06)

Let's try for the following week - 25th.   That way we can see if we can
push
the process a step or two further.    (07)

Best regards,
Denise    (08)




             "Peter P. Yim"    (09)

             <peter.yim@cim3    (010)

             .com>
To 
             Sent by:                Ontologizing-Ontolog    (011)

             ontologizing-bo         <ontologizing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    (012)

             unces@xxxxxxxxx
cc 
             im3.net    (013)


Subject 
                                     Re: [ontologizing] Re: [TaxoThesaurus]    (014)

             05/15/2006              Ontolog Wiki Inventory    (015)

             12:26 PM    (016)





             Please respond    (017)

                   to    (018)

             Ontologizing-On    (019)

                  tolog    (020)

             <ontologizing@o    (021)

             ntolog.cim3.net    (022)

                    >    (023)









Denise,    (024)


 > [DB] this Thursday ... cannot participate - but the three  > of you can
definitely go ahead and meet and I'll catch up  > later.    (025)

[ppy] Unfortunate ... how about the immediate following week (same time Thu
5/25)?    (026)


 > [DB] You are right about the spreadsheet - it seems that it  > cut off
about 202 lines (content objects) at the bottom.
 > I will go back and regenerate the export from the Coast site  > map to
include the last 202 objects.    (027)

[ppy] hopefully, using, say, the .csv format may break us loose from the
spreadsheet maximum number of rows constraint.    (028)

Ref my earlier discussion (see:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//ontologizing/2006-05/msg00002.html#nid09
), I noticed on your inventory spreadsheet, you ARE inventorying all
versions of a wiki page. Therefore, ref that discussion, you might consider
just inventorying the 'current' version of each page, and leave the history
behind.    (029)

 > [DB] > Re:  shared file workspace - let me see if I can run  > the
Teragram concept extraction file against a remote  > directory.    (030)

[ppy] you have already captured the links in your inventory map now. Ref
your spreadsheet <ontolog-cwe-inventory-map_dbedford_20060514a.xls> rows
22382 & below (showing our shared ./file/resource content), and, rows
25407 & below (showing our shared ./file/work content).    (031)

The way we have it, any item that is dropped into the CWE -- i.e.
discussion archives, wiki page or shred-files in the repository) are browser
(http) accessible. Which means, you don't have to 'map' to a 'remote
directory' ... as long as Teragram can extract via a web link, our content
will be available (as it is already being served by apache over http.)
Thanks & regards.  =ppy
--    (032)



dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Mon, 15 May 2006 11:59:59 -0400:
> Peter,
>
> Unfortunately, I have a KMWG Board Meeting this Thursday so cannot 
> participate
-
> but the three of you can definitely go ahead and meet and I'll catch up
later.
>
> You are right about the spreadsheet - it seems that it cut off about 202
lines
> (content objects) at the bottom.   I will go back and regenerate the
export
from
> the Coast site map to include the last 202 objects.   Also, this is only
to
> Level 6 so anything lower in the WIKI will not be included.
>
> Re:  shared file workspace - let me see if I can run the Teragram concept
> extraction file against a remote directory.   If I can, we don't need a
second
> store of the data.  If I need a "local Bank"
>
> Best regards,
> Denise    (033)



>              "Peter P. Yim"    (034)

>              <peter.yim@cim3    (035)

>              .com>
To
>              Sent by:                Ontologizing-Ontolog    (036)

>              ontologizing-bo         <ontologizing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    (037)

>              unces@xxxxxxxxx
cc
>              im3.net    (038)

>
Subject
>                                      [ontologizing] Re: 
> [TaxoThesaurus]    (039)

>              05/15/2006              Ontolog Wiki Inventory    (040)

>              11:40 AM    (041)

>    (042)

>    (043)

>              Please respond    (044)

>                    to    (045)

>              Ontologizing-On    (046)

>                   tolog    (047)

>              <ontologizing@o    (048)

>              ntolog.cim3.net    (049)

>                     >    (050)

>    (051)

>
>
>
> Denise,
>
> 1. This is great!
>
> (a) Denise ... your plan sounds good.
>
> (b) we actually don't have a Invited Speaker or Scheduled Discussion 
> Event for Ontolog this Thursday (nor the next week).
> Would be great if we devote, say, half the session, on discussions 
> relating to this project. Can you all make it to this Thursday's (5/11 
> 1:30~3:00pm EDT / 10:30am~12:00 PDT) call? And next week's?
>
> 2. File content: at first glance -
>
> (a) I unzipped and opened up your spreadsheet file with my OpenOffice 
> application (I don't have MS Excel on my desktop machine), and was 
> only able to see up to row 65536. I have a feeling this may not be the 
> end of the content you have put together. It seems that either you or 
> I ran into a constraint posed by either yours or my spreadsheet 
> program.
>
> (b) I'll check (other versions of spreadsheet programs) too, but would 
> you check and see if you might be able to put the content into a 
> different file format (say, .csv) so that we can avoid this 
> limitation, and possibly make the file more portable too, please 
> Denise?
>
> 3. Ref. the attachment limitations ... Yes.
>
> (a) I renamed Denise' file to
> <ontolog-cwe-inventory-map_dbedford_20060514a.zip> sand have done 
> uploading both the zip file and the unzipped .xls file. You will be 
> able to find them under:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/TaxoThesaurus/
>
> (b) the CWE is designed so that users can drag and drop their shared 
> file into the shared-file workspace via WebDAV (the web distributed 
> authoring and versioning protocol).
>
> (c) the instructions (a one time setup) to set oneself up for this 
> file upload can be found at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ToolsCollaboration#nidAVL
> ... please try it. It could be a bit tricky for some machines, but I 
> will be more than happy to walk the members of this team through the 
> setup (during one of our calls) in the near future, if anyone wants 
> it.
>
> (d) our shared-file workspace:
>
>  > [DB] Peter do you think you could create the directory for  > us to 
> work from?
>
> [ppy] Our workspace for this project (is already up), and they are at:
>
> Wiki (collaborative authoring / shared display):
>
> Discussion workspace:
>    distribution-list: mailto:ontologizing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    discussion archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontologizing/
>
> Shared-file workspace:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/TaxoThesaurus/
>
> [ref:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologTaxoThesaurus#nidMU1 ]
>
> ... don't know if that answers your question, Denise?
> (In particular, if the "shared-file workspace" directory the 
> "directory" you want to see created?
>
> Thanks & regards.  =ppy
> --    (052)


> Bob Smith wrote Mon, 15 May 2006 07:50:29 -0700:
>> Hi Denise,
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Your plans for next steps sounds reasonable to me;
>>
>> - I do not have immediate access to a crawler but I will check with a 
>> friend at Kayvium about the status of his software.
>>
>> - Lisa, Peter: any comments?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bob    (053)


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:38 AM
>> To: Peter P. Yim; Bob Smith; Lisa
>> Subject: Ontolog Wiki Inventory
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Attached (at long last) is an inventory of the content of the Ontolog 
>> Wiki down to Level 6 in the tree structure.  (See attached file: 
>> Ontolog Wiki Site Map.zip).  The Ontology tree actually goes down 23 
>> levels - across the full site
>> - but after running the full scan it seemed that most of the content 
>> was at level 6 or above.
>>
>> It is about 15m, so I zipped it to get through any size ceilings you 
>> might have on your email.  As it turns out the file is too large for 
>> the list so I'm sending it to your direct email addresses.
>>
>> Here's how to reach the contents of the inventory:
>>
>> Column A = path to the file
>> Column B = File Name
>> Column C = File Extension/Type
>> Column D = Title if there is one available Column E = Author where 
>> available Column F = Last Modified Date Column G = File Size Column H 
>> = downloading speed (we use this to check for slow pages/content) 
>> Column I = Outbound Link Column J = External Links
>>
>> Suggested next steps:
>>
>>    the team - Lisa especially - reviews the inventory to decide what 
>> kinds of
>>    content we will cover in our ontologizing exercise
>>    we make a copy of the inventory wihch reflects our selections, and 
>> extract
>>    the content to be ontologized from the wiki.  Bob or Lisa - do you 
>> know of a
>>    crawler we could use to collect the content?   If not, I can do this
but
>> it
>>    might take me a bit longer since I'll have to work at it in 
>> bits/pieces of
>>    time or ask a colleague here to recommend a tool;
>>    store the content in a directory - Peter do you think you could 
>> create the
>>    directory for us to work from?
>>    once we have the actual content in one/more directories, I'll 
>> proceed to run
>>    the concept extraction and build the categorizer, summarizer
>>
>> Does this sound like a plan?   Please let me know if you want me to run
the
>> scan
>> deeper - Peter can probably tell at a glance what is missing from the 
>> inventory.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Denise    (054)

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontologizing/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontologizing/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ Community Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologizingOntolog    (055)




_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontologizing/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontologizing/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ Community Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologizingOntolog    (056)



_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontologizing/ 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontologizing/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologizingOntolog    (057)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>