Hello Steven, (01)
Merry Christmas! (02)
Your comments are not very enlightening for me. Should I watch the video? (03)
I cannot possibly comment your views on general relativity but if you do not
aim for non-computable functions but instead for philosophical implications of
computational complexity, you probably have read Scott Aaronson? (04)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1108.1791v3.pdf (05)
I'll have to read this again to catch on but my guess is that you disagree
with Aaronson. (06)
What do you mean with "non-locality that is evident in biophysics"? Most
physicists would sell their grandmother for locality. (07)
Do you claim that consciousness harnesses a computational power of the
universe not available to our machines? (08)
Regards, (09)
Michael Brunnbauer (010)
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:39:04AM -0800, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote:
> Yes indeed, falsification is a part of physics, I argue, although this
> point of view is not very popular among physicists these days.
>
> Until 2010 all of my work was in public. Unfortunately, I discovered that
> this is not sustainable for advanced basic research, early and incomplete
> ideas are too often subject to unwarranted criticism.
>
> My claim is only that the current models of computation are inadequate - in
> this I agree with Penrose. In particular, the solutions to General
> Recognition and decision making across large scale structures are
> impossible to consider.
>
> I make an informal argument, based upon a power analysis for conventional
> computation, that says modern computation is excluded from biophysics.
> There is no "load/store architecture," for example, in biophysics and, if
> you watched my video, at the end I note that memory is "free" in energy
> terms.
>
> So we need something new. That something is based upon a non-locality that
> is evident in biophysics. I hope to illustrate the new physics, along with
> new foundations for logic and apprehension, required to enable new models
> of computation in the book. I do not believe that anything is
> "non-computable," as Penrose does, in this sense.
>
> I should add that the physics I work with is experimental. It is my goal to
> provide viable alternative explanations for the current wealth of 20th
> century physical data, but my focus is the biophysics.
>
> My claim that light is static and the foundation of the gravitational
> effect, appears necessarily controversial, I know. It is, however, based
> upon existing equations in physics. Indeed, it exists in contemporary
> literature as the "heat death" of the universe. I simply use it as a purely
> mathematical starting point from which to reason. If you consider a
> universe consisting only of "photons," in conventional terms "traveling at
> the speed of light" then there is no "time" or "motion."
>
> Why get involved in the physics at this level? Well, it is important that I
> illustrate how we can mathematically unify a viable theory of biophysics
> with the remainder of physics.
>
> The book will be finished and generally available in the middle of the
> coming year. My health allowing.
>
> Regards,
> Steven
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello Steven,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 02:36:48PM -0800, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote:
> > > I suggest you familiarize yourself with my main arguments that can be
> > found
> > > in a recent Stanford lecture, available on YouTube, and in written form
> > at
> > > https://www.createspace.com/Preview/1137409???
> >
> > Your arguments are not more clear to me after reading this.
> >
> > Why is the full book only available to "Qualified subscribers"?
> >
> > Do you claim that physics involves a non-computable function?
> >
> > Does your theory make any falsifiable predictions?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael Brunnbauer
> >
> > --
> > ++ Michael Brunnbauer
> > ++ netEstate GmbH
> > ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a
> > ++ 81379 München
> > ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
> > ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89
> > ++ E-Mail brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ++ http://www.netestate.de/
> > ++
> > ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
> > ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342
> > ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
> > ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> > Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> > Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> > Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> > To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> >
> > (011)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> (012)
--
++ Michael Brunnbauer
++ netEstate GmbH
++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a
++ 81379 München
++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89
++ E-Mail brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx
++ http://www.netestate.de/
++
++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel (013)
pgpS3p1pHqzJI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|