To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:02:55 -0400 |
Message-id: | <5240905F.6070107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On 9/22/13 9:16 PM, John F Sowa wrote: > On 9/22/2013 8:36 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> RDBMS engines are simply too primitive (by default) to protect access to >> the data they store. They need a logical firewall to tighten up security. > I'm not going to defend the RDBMS engines or the SQL standard. I > partly blame Ted Codd for not paying more attention to the way the > gang down the hall was designing SQL. I also blame the CIA for > adopting an early version of SQL (as specified in the IBM Journal > of R & D) and sending out a BAA for somebody to implement it. > Oracle bid for it. IBM didn't. > > Two points I will defend: a clean logical foundation, and appropriate > locking methods to ensure data integrity during updates. (01) Yes, that's where SQL RDBMS technology is very strong relative to alternatives. > > Despite its quirks, the SQL WHERE clause supports full FOL. (02) Yes, but it doesn't get you round the issue of scalable ad-hoc queries that exploit entity relationship semantics. (03) > SPARQL > doesn't. (04) It does address the problem of ad-hoc querying that leverages entity relationship semantics. (05) > For data integrity, you need some kind of "silo" to ensure > that the DB constraints are preserved during updates. (06) We are diverging in our perception of "silo" since even a pure OLTP RDBMS still benefits from being able to leverage entity relationship semantics as part of integrity constraints apparatus. Theses systems still have to be able to handle social-engineering challenges which are best solved by evaluation of relation semantics. (07) Where we ultimately converge is this: the combination of existing SQL RDBMS technology and more recent SPARQL innovations enable the development of hybrid DBMS solutions that offer the best of both worlds. (08) Links: (09) [1] http://kingsley.idehen.net/DAV/home/kidehen/Public/SPASQL%20Queries/ -- folder where (overtime) I will periodically drop SPASQL (SPARQL inside SQL query examples) [2] http://kingsley.idehen.net/DAV/home/kidehen/Public/SPASQL%20Queries/email_lookup_and_case_when.sql (010) -- first example . (011) Kingsley > > John > > _________________________________________________________________ > Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ > Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ > Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ > Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ > To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J > > > (012) -- (013) Regards, (014) Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen (015)
smime.p7s _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] The Convergence of Engineering Disciplines in Modern Product Development, Kingsley Idehen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web & NLP Technology Combo: TellMeFirst, Kingsley Idehen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data, Silos, Interoperability, and Agility, John F Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data, Silos, Interoperability, and Agility, John F Sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |