To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | matthew lange <mclange@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 7 May 2013 21:55:01 -0700 |
Message-id: | <CAKJtitsDBFiqqcCq48hvZ9Co=rKznxBBQvv9=+PmcFSb5FyS-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> The article says that 'bark' is a noun. But based on the article, we still don't know if it is tree bark or (a) dog bark! On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Barkmeyer, Edward J <edward.barkmeyer@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Pat, _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 15,000-year-old ancestral language, Barkmeyer, Edward J |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Call for Polemics at SePublica 2013, Alexander Garcia Castro |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 15,000-year-old ancestral language, Barkmeyer, Edward J |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 15,000-year-old ancestral language, Patrick Cassidy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |