|From:||Chris Menzel <chris.menzel@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:40:10 -0500|
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Andries van Renssen <andries.vanrenssen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As many ontolog-forum members will know, this idea lies at the heart of the semantics of Common Logic and (as a historical consequence) RDF. In Common Logic, there is just one domain of objects. Some of those objects can be identified with relations, but everything is a "first-class citizen".
Well, the idea goes back a good deal farther than Nijssen, although he was probably the first to introduce the idea into his particular community.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, Andries van Renssen|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Binary versus N-ary relations, doug foxvog|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Binary versus N-ary relations, doug foxvog|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Binary versus N-ary relations, William Frank|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|