ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Truth

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Menzel <chris.menzel@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:08:36 -0500
Message-id: <615DDD5C-2C44-4FF7-8972-29B19157003A@xxxxxxx>

On Jul 6, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Chris Menzel wrote:    (01)

> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>wrote:
> 
> Hello Matthew,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:35:02PM +0100, Matthew West wrote:
> > CM> ... classes are extensional in OWL.
> > Is that extensional in that the extension is the members declared in the 
>OWL ontology, or is that extensional in the sense that the members define the 
>class, but I might not know about all of them?
> 
> I think it's extensional in the sense that classes are not first class 
>entities
> but defined via the extension of the rdf:type property.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#sinterp
> 
> Actually, yes, there is an RDF-compatible semantics for OWL I'd forgotten 
>about where OWL classes are simply entities that are assigned sets of 
>individuals as their extensions. In this semantics, distinct classes can have 
>the same "members". But IIRC in both the W3C "direct" semantics for OWL and 
>the "model theoretic" semantics, OWL classes are simply sets of individuals.
> 
> Pat will probably jump in here and straighten me out...    (02)

(Back from being a builder of kitchens, Pat reads lots of emails...)    (03)

FIrst, there are several OWLs. OWL-Full is the most RDF-compatible, with very 
few restrictions on what can be said in it, but has no complete reasoners so 
isn't very widely used. OWL-DL has many restrictions. OWL-Full follows RDF and 
RDFS in treating classes as first-class (sorry about the pun) entities and 
intensional, not extensional (in the sense that classes are not identified with 
sets, so it is consistent for two classes to have exactly the same members but 
still be distinct classes.) OWL-DL is quite different: it does not allow 
classes to be first-class entities, and it assumes that classes are defined 
extensionally, i.e. are sets, ie defined by their membership. So, to sum up:    (04)

extensional = classes are identified with the sets of their members.
intensional = not extensional, so having the same members does not guarantee 
identity of classes. (Put another way, classes have 'robust identity' which is 
independent of their membership.)    (05)

OWL-Full: classes are individuals, just as in RDF and RDFS and Common Logic. 
Classes are intensional.
OWL-DL: classes are not individuals, and  properties (binary relations) only 
relate individuals, not classes. In the language of the ISO Common Logic specs, 
OWL-DL is a segregated dialect. Classes are extensional.     (06)

The OWL specs give a 'direct' semantics for OWL-DL (which was the only OWL that 
many of the WG cared about, those people also being not particularly interested 
in RDF) whlie allowing OWL-Full to simply be an RDF extension. This makes for 
confusing reading, and is the primary reason the specs are so hard to follow..    (07)

(There is also the newer standard OWL2-DL, which relaxes the syntax to 
apparently allow classes to contain other classes, just as in OWL-Full, but in 
fact it does this by a mechanism called 'punning' which keeps the underlying 
segregation in the semantics. And it also assumes extensionality.)    (08)

Hope this helps.    (09)

Pat    (010)


> 
> -chris
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (011)

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (012)






_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (013)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>