To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:50:59 -0400 |
Message-id: | <4E4ABC13.7060601@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
On 8/16/2011 2:40 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote: > So my question was whether what he was describing was simply an *idea* > of a method or something that actually exists. (01) Good question. I'll let Rich answer that. (02) But I'd like to emphasize that the *idea* of using lattices has an enormous range of practical implementations. And I'd strongly urge people to relate their implementations and proposals for implementations to these theoretical ideas. (03) Such exercises can have two important results: (04) 1. Encouraging implementers to develop their tools in ways that are guided by general principles that may lead to important generalizations and avoid pitfalls and dead ends. (05) 2. Encourage theoreticians to look for theories that have important practical applications that can be implemented with a minimal amount of extra coding. (06) John (07) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (08) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology going offline, Duane Nickull |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] FW: Self Interest Ontology - Bacteria Use Case 1, Avril Styrman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology, Christopher Menzel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Self Interest Ontology, Rich Cooper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |