ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Fact Guru, Controlled NLs, and OOR

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Chris Partridge <partridge.csj@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:49:42 +0100
Message-id: <001801cbef13$9e2b5c50$da8214f0$@googlemail.com>
Hi Leo,    (01)

> And note that there is not a 1-1 relationship between terms and
> concepts, but a many-many, depending on the language and of course the
> ontology.    (02)

Depends on what you think of as the term. If you have an
utterance/inscription view, it is one-many.    (03)

Chris    (04)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Obrst, Leo J.
> Sent: 30 March 2011 20:17
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Fact Guru, Controlled NLs, and OOR
> 
> The way to distinguish terminology and ontology is that you use terms
(natural
> language words, phrases) to refer to "concepts" (ideas, referents,
categories,
> etc.) So the former is semantics, i.e., ways of referring (quite often
just lexical
> semantics, but you can imagine a phrase "gasoline tank" or "steel
crankshaft,
> corroded and discarded"), the latter is ontology, i.e., what is referred
to,
> typically real world objects or categories.
> 
> You may also use a term as a label for a concept, which is fine if you
understand
> the distinction, but the concept could be labeled KDKJKDLK123 in the
ontology
> and that really is just as valid, if perverse (though you cannot interpret
it
> semantically as an English speaker unless you see the term in the
terminology
> that refers to it). And note that there is not a 1-1 relationship between
terms and
> concepts, but a many-many, depending on the language and of course the
> ontology.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leo
> _____________________________________________
> Dr. Leo Obrst        The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics
> lobrst@xxxxxxxxx     Information Discovery & Understanding, Command &
> Control Center
> Voice: 703-983-6770  7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305
> Fax: 703-983-1379    McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Bennett
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:07 PM
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Fact Guru, Controlled NLs, and OOR
> 
> We made a point of not including words / lexical terms as ontology
objects, i.e.
> no use of OWL Equivalent Class.
> 
> As Mike Atkin puts it, people will argue forever about the meaning of a
word,
> but will soon reach consensus on the concepts themselves. To include those
in
> the ontology actually makes the ontology harder to explain to business
> stakeholders.
> 
> Also does that mean you have two separate theories of meaning within the
> same model? How do you distinguish those e.g. is there is some obvious
visual
> distinction between the sets of terms that come under the two theories?
> 
> Mike
> 
> On 30/03/2011 17:49, Matthew West wrote:
> > Dear Mike,
> >
> > One of the things we did in ISO 15926 was to distinguish logical
> > terms/concepts/meanings from their representation by words/lexical
> > terms/phrases, but treating the lexical terms as first class objects
> > in the ontology itself, rather than things outside it.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Matthew West
> > Information  Junction
> > Tel: +44 1489 880185
> > Mobile: +44 750 3385279
> > Skype: dr.matthew.west
> > matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
> > http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
> >
> > This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in
> > England and Wales No. 6632177.
> > Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
> > Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
> >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Bennett
> >> Sent: 30 March 2011 16:50
> >> To: [ontolog-forum]
> >> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Fact Guru, Controlled NLs, and OOR
> >>
> >> That does sound interesting. I had a sort of "Aha" moment last week
> >> when we were talking about synonyms and heteronyms at an OMG / EDM
> >> Council event. It struck me that an ontology has formal definitions
> >> of concepts with synonyms, whereas a terminology is a set of words,
> >> with one or more meanings per word, and therefore has heteronyms.
> >> That's why for instance we have no concept of heteronym in our
> >> ontology. Nor (for similar reasons) do we have homonyms.
> >>
> >> No doubt for most people that's this week's glimpse into the obvious,
> >> but it made things come clear for me - ontologies and terminologies
> >> are complementary but different, so any tool that formally relates
> >> one to the other has to be good.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On 30/03/2011 15:05, John F. Sowa wrote:
> >>> We have discussed the relationships between ontologies and
> >> terminologies
> >>> in many email threads.  Some people blur the distinction by saying
> >> that
> >>> their terminologies are ontologies, and others make a sharp
> >> distinction
> >>> between them.  But one point is clear:  the people who use
> >> applications
> >>> only see terminologies, and the developers need to relate ontologies
> >>> to terminologies.
> >>>
> >>> A few weeks ago, I sent a note that mentioned Fact Guru by Doug
> >>> Skuce as tool that could help bridge the gap between terminologies
> >>> and ontologies.  In particular, FG could simplify the task of
> >>> mapping the terms of an terminology to the more formal ontology.
> >>> After the development of the ontology, FG could be used to display
> >>> either or both, side by side.  For the Open Ontology Repository, FG
> >>> could be useful, but only if the software were available as open
source.
> >>>
> >>> Therefore, I had a discussion with Doug about the possibility of
> >>> releasing the Fact Guru software as open source under the LGPL.
> >>> Doug agreed, and he is also planning to attend the Ontology Summit
> >>> on April 18.  He would be happy to discuss the use of FG with anyone
> >>> who may be interested.  On the cc list above, I added the email for
> >>> Doug Skuce and for John Talbot, who did most of the implementation.
> >>>
> >>> In the links below, note the wide range of sophistication of the
> >>> possible applications.  The Animals example was implemented by
> >>> Doug's 9-year-old daughter as a school project.  The SUMO example
> >>> was downloaded from the actual SUMO ontology.  For each term in
> >>> SUMO, FG shows both the English-like text and the axioms written in
> >>> KIF.
> >>>
> >>> John Sowa
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: Fact Guru
> >>> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:31:05 -0500
> >>> From: John F. Sowa<sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> To: [ontolog-forum]<ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> CC: Doug Skuce<drskuce@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> I was talking with an old friend, Doug Skuce, who taught AI and
> >>> knowledge engineering at the University of Ottawa for many years.
> >>> He and his students and colleagues have developed some software that
> >>> could be valuable for designing and supporting ontologies.
> >>>
> >>> In the late 80s he developed a knowledge acquisition tool called
> >>> CODE (Conceptually Oriented Development Environment) in Smalltalk.
> >>> Since CODE did not run on the web, he designed a new version called
> >>> Fact Guru in the late 90s.  FG can be used to organize a knowledge
> >>> base of any kind and present it in a highly readable way;
> >>>
> >>>       http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~tcl/factguru1/FactGuru.pdf
> >>>
> >>> Following is a blurb from the web site:
> >>>
> >>>       With Fact Guru you can improve understanding by:
> >>>
> >>>         * storing facts grouped by subject in a highly structured
> >>>           knowledge base.
> >>>
> >>>         * searching the knowledge base to find just the fact you
> >>> need
> >>>
> >>>         * comparing subjects to see a comparison matrix of
> >>> differences
> >>>
> >>>         * viewing subjects as a graph to see relationships between
> >> them
> >>> For a beginner's example that uses only English, see the knowledge
> >>> base of Canadian Animals, which was implemented by Doug's nine year
> >>> old daughter.  Click on any animal name to find a collection of
> >>> information about it:
> >>>
> >>>       http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~tcl/factguru1/animals/index.html
> >>>
> >>> More important for ontology is the use of Fact Guru to import,
> >>> organize, and display the top-level ontology of SUMO:
> >>>
> >>>       http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~tcl/factguru1/sumo/index.html
> >>>
> >>> For an example of a knowledge base about a technical subject, see
> >>> the Fact Guru KB about the Java programming language, which Doug
> >>> used for teaching a course on Java:
> >>>
> >>>       http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~tcl/factguru1/java/index.html
> >>>
> >>> This KB is important for two reasons:  (1) it is cross linked to an
> >>> associated HTML document about Java; and (2) it is written in a
> >>> version of controlled English called ClearTalk.
> >>>
> >>> Doug is currently working with some programmers who are
> >>> reimplementing Fact Guru with the Drupal content management software
> >>> in order to organize and relate multiple knowledge bases.  This
> >>> could be useful for the Open Ontology Repository.
> >>>
> >>> I thought that participants in Ontolog Forum might express their
> >>> wish list about features that would be useful for supporting
> >>> ontologies and their applications.
> >>>
> >>> John Sowa
> >>>
> >>>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> >>> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-
> >> forum/
> >>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
> >>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join:
> >>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> >>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mike Bennett
> >> Director
> >> Hypercube Ltd.
> >> 89 Worship Street
> >> London EC2A 2BF
> >> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7917 9522
> >> Mob: +44 (0) 7721 420 730
> >> www.hypercube.co.uk
> >> Registered in England and Wales No. 2461068
> >>
> >>
> >>
> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> >> Config Subscr:
> >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> >> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
> >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join:
> >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> >> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> > Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> > Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join:
> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> > To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Bennett
> Director
> Hypercube Ltd.
> 89 Worship Street
> London EC2A 2BF
> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7917 9522
> Mob: +44 (0) 7721 420 730
> www.hypercube.co.uk
> Registered in England and Wales No. 2461068
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-
> bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-
> bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     (05)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>