To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Simon Spero <ses@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:32:32 -0500 |
Message-id: | <AANLkTimErhYrrFGOu80bcrW25h-BRkFqsiqBngmFPeh3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:58 PM, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Java's object model isn't really much like CLOS; the primary dispatch mechanism was vtable based, and there was no multiple inheritance[1] except for via interfaces. Interface/protocol types are I believe original to Java, and would have made the MOP specification quite a bit more elegant.
. S-PLUS / R has a very LISP like feel - first class functions, a CLOS like object model, and keyword style argument passing. This in a language designed for... statistics. And we're back on topic :-) [2]
Simon [1] "And what is the use, thought Alice, of a language without polyhierarchy?" _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] IBM Watson's Final Jeopardy error "explanation", Patrick Durusau |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] IBM Watson's Final Jeopardy error "explanation", John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] IBM Watson's Final Jeopardy error "explanation", John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] IBM Watson's Final Jeopardy error "explanation", John F. Sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |