|From:||Simon Spero <ses@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:08:15 -0500|
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Selcuk Bozdag <sbozdag@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:|
[Other people have given pointers to domain specific ontologies so I'll just chip in with a few more general points]
Some ontology languages allow relationships to have more than two arguments; for the example given one could say (transfersMoney ?SENDER ?RECIPIENT ?AMOUNT ?DATE ?TRANSFER-ID).
In languages like OWL that only allow for binary relations, you are going to have to create an intermediate object of some kind.
If only one of the arguments has a real identity, you can wrap up all the others in an anonymous object and relate the main object to this anonymous object. The usual example of this pattern is relating a person to a mailing address with several fields.
However, in the example, there are several objects that have identities, so you would create an intermediate object that all of the arguments relate to.
Tm1 types TransfersMoneyObject.
Tm1 hasSender <sender>.
Tm1 hasRecipient <recipient>.
Tm1 hasAmount <amount>.
Tm1 hasDate <date>.
Tm1 hasTransferID <id>.
TransfersMoneyObject is starting to look like a MoneyTransfer... The fact that this object has properties that relate to the money transfer event, rather than to either of the account directly (date, amount, transfer-id) strongly indicates that treating MoneyTransfers as individuals in their own right is the best approach.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Quote for the day -- KR and KM, Zhuk, Yefim|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Quote for the day -- KR and KM, Ed Barkmeyer|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Modeling a money transferring scenario, Mike Bennett|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Modeling a money transferring scenario, Zhuk, Yefim|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|