Bill,
Agreed - its not possible to assign a single meaning to most real world
sized ontology terms. It is true, as John Sowa and Doug Foxvog among
others state, that WordNet was not called an ontology by its creators, and it
certainly misses the inference wagon, but toma'to, tomato, IMHO, I don’t
see much progress in other more “official” designated ontologies. So
the practical test of whether some cluster of knowledge is called an ontology
is just an exercise in English definitions, IMHO.
There may be some hope of disambiguation when we figure out how to plug
in the interpretER and her unique associations with words and phrases. But
the discussions here assume (incorrectly) that ontologies will be unambiguous. I
don’t agree with that, though there are some great ontologists here and I
am just a country boy in the ontology forest.
-Rich
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Burkett, William [USA]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 8:45 AM
To: [ontolog-forum] ; doug@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] (renamed) Terms with fixed/multiple meanings
Critical error: The last sentence should read "it isn't
possible" or "it's not possible"!!!
Doh!!! (reread, Bill, reread!!!)
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Burkett, William [USA]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 9:40 AM
To: doug@xxxxxxxxxx; [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] (renamed) Terms with fixed/multiple
meanings
Doug --
I'd like to respond to just one of your points here, since it seems the
conversation has already moved on past this point.
>Why? Every author of Java code uses the same meaning of
"method" and
>other reserved words. Every HTML author uses the same meaning
of <title>.
There is a huge huge difference between Java and ontologies.
Java, as a programming language, is a closed semantic system. The meaning
of the terms in the Java language are precisely defined wrt the behavior of
computing machinery.
Ontologies, on the other hand, do not describe the nature or behavior
of the closed-world of a computing machine. They describe the very-open
real world and we - people - choose the terms we use to describe the real
world. Therefore it's possible - imho - to assign a single and precise
meaning to a term. Unless, of course, you are the creator and sole user
of that term. :-)
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of doug foxvog
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:19 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] (renamed) Terms with fixed/multiple
meanings
On Thu, September 9, 2010 12:03, Burkett, William [USA] said:
> John: I understand your point that a "term" in a formal
language (e.g.,
> ontology) should have a single, unique definition - this allows
automated
> processors to (soundly) do something with statements in the
language.
> It is important to point out, however, that this requirement addresses
a
> very small set of users "out there in web-land" - less
than 1% I would
> guess.
Why? Every author of Java code uses the same meaning of
"method" and
other reserved words. Every HTML author uses the same meaning of
<title>.
Of course, most people who run JAVA programs don't know a thing about
JAVA,
nor do people who create web pages enter the HTML manually. They
have
tools that compose the web pages for them. We similarly have to
get to
the point that that people who enter data into the semantic web don't
need to know the details of the data encoding (or the ontologies!) just
as data enterers don't need to know the details of databases into which
they are entering data.
> The "semantic web" will never materialize with
this requirement
> because, simply, a very very large percentage of data-creators
don't have
> the understanding and won't devote the time/rigor required to
create these
> semantically precise statements.
Thus we need data entry tools for them. They use data entry tools
when
putting data into databases. Why should it be different for the
Semantic
Web.
Coders need to know about existing ontologies and the correct way to
reference them and determine the appropriate terms to use -- just as
JAVA coders or designers of webpage creation software need to know
the syntax of the languages that they use.
> Most will create their schemas and
> ontologies and create their data using their natural language
> skills/capabilities/facilities - leading to multiple and evolving
> meanings.
Here, you are partially referring to coders, but also referring
to the use of natural language. The two should be kept separate.
Early on, programmers wrote the subroutines for doing the same
thing many times. But now, with huge libraries of methods,
skilled programmers know how to find and select the methods they
need for a specific purpose. Selecting a semantic term for a
specific purpose should be similar.
> So, realistically, except for a very small population,
"terms"
> that are used to name things in web-land *will* have multiple
meanings.
With appropriate tools, we'll move beyond this. Hand-written web
pages
were initially full of bugs, so over the decades, they went out of
style
as tools and standards for creating better ones became available.
The
creation of such tools and standards would hopefully shorten this
learning
curve for the Semantic Web.
The creation of an Open Ontology Repository would do a lot to solve
this
problem. Search tools for determining appropriate well-defined
semantic
terms are needed.
-- doug f
> We can exclude those undisciplined cases and operate in our own
small,
> rigorous, well-defined world - but how useful will that really
be? (Like
> everything in AI, it seems, it'll be useful in special cases, but
not in
> general.)
>
> As I write this, it brings the question of scope to my mind: in
our
> discussions here are we ONLY interested in talking about formal
ontologies
> with precisely-defined semantics that can soundly reasoned over, or
are we
> talking about the "semantic web" (or "semantic
enterprises") in general
> where, presumably, we can evolve to a point where processors can
do
> something will all the data "out there in web-land"?
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
F. Sowa
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:04 PM
> To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Enterprise Architecture -
> Interoperability?
>
> David and Doug,
>
> DF>> a Semantic Web needs ontologies of terms with fixed
meanings
>
> DE> Is this saying that a term (word, phrase, acronym,
abbreviation,
>> whatever) can only have a single meaning?
>
> We must always distinguish the names of relations and instances
> in any formal language from the words in any natural language
> that is being mapped to that formal language.
>
> DF used the word 'term' for the symbols in some formal language.
> Those symbols should have unique definitions.
>
> DE was talking about the words used in some NL that is being
> mapped to the symbols of some formal language.
>
> The names used in the formalism should never be identified
> with the words in the NL -- even when their spelling happens
> to be similar.
>
> John
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
=============================================================
doug foxvog doug@xxxxxxxxxx
http://ProgressiveAustin.org
"I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be
ours."
- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
=============================================================
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx