----- Original Message -----
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> (01)
> Dick,
>
> It is hard to imagine how anybody could say anything more
> simple-minded that that:
#### Is it really so simple-minded, when the next words out of
#### your mouth are "context is certainly relevant"?
>
> RHM> All of your "problems" can be summarized in one word: CONTEXT.
> > The "solutions" are readily available: use a CONTEXT LANGUAGE.
> > mKR is a CONTEXT LANGUAGE.
>
> Context is certainly relevant. There are many well thought out
> theories and formalisms that have addressed the subject of context.
> But doing justice to the subject requires far more than a notation
> that happens to be decorated with the word 'context'.
#### If context is the central problem, then how can you deal with
#### the problem, unless you have a language based on context?
#### If you think that context is only a "decoration" in the mKR
#### language, then you don't understand mKR at all.
>
> Please do your homework, study the issues, and read the many volumes
> of publications by people who have actually done their homework.
#### Context is an essential ingredient of Cyc.
#### Have they done their homework?
#### Is the Cyc philosophy relevant to the
#### "Past, Present, and Future of Ontology"? (02)
#### I grant that you are a great scholar, John.
#### But can't you put aside your academic bias long enough
#### to consider whether I am right or not? (03)
>
> John
>
Dick McCullough
http://mkrmke.org (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|