On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Richard H. McCullough
<rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> More generally, I agree with you that "the meaning of a sentence
>> depends on the context of the thinker/speaker". The problem with your
>> mKR formalism is I just don't think you will be able to enumerate all
>> these different "meanings", list all distinguishing cases, etc.
> ...
> ***** I'm not looking at all possible cases ("possible worlds"),
> ***** only the particular case appropriate for a particular
> ***** sentence. (01)
How many distinct sentences do you want to be able to deal with? (02)
>> Rather than defining new sets of labels as I understand your mKR to
>> do, I think the way ahead will be to look at the different ways data
>> can come together to generate new classes/concepts/"languages"
>> spontaneously.
> ***** I don't know what "new sets of labels" means ??? (03)
A new language, in the formal sense. (04)
-Rob (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|