On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
> Antoinette
> What can I do to help you "get it"? (01)
A rigorous semantics would be a good start, i.e., a mathematically
precise account of how an alleged knowledge representation language
actually *represents*. As far as I can see from the web site, mKR is
just uninterpreted syntax with an informal, quasi-philosophical
semantic gloss. In this day and age, a rigorous semantics is a sine
qua non for a KR language. (Compare OWL, CyCL, Conceptual Graphs,
Common Logic, etc.) (02)
Chris Menzel (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|