To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:32:31 -0500 |
Message-id: | <p06240801c4ec7d71b436@[10.100.0.140]> |
At 8:48 AM -0400 9/9/08, John F. Sowa wrote:
Dear Matthew, Of course. But the key point is that to assert existence in the
4d framework an assertion itself is not temporal. Assertions stand
outside time and speak about it, rather than being embedded in it and
having to speak about other times indirectly, for example by using
tenses. Moreover, it frees one from the confusion that relates
intensionality to existence over time.
Not true. There is no 'now' in a 4-d universe.
All of which is a lot easier in a 4-d framework.
Of course not, but it does enable one to distinguish between a
description of change, and a changing description. JFS seems to be
embedded in a framework which conflates these so badly that the
difference is invisible, which is MW's point.
The fundamental laws of Bottom line: don't get intension/extension confused with temporal
criteria of identity, and don't get either of them confused with
set/individual. JFAS thinks that sets change, which is wrong. Sets are
like numbers, they are Platonic individuals. To lose this point is to
become hopelessly confused. If we speak of a set of widgets, and then
a new widget is made, the SET has not changed. There are two sets, one
having one more element than the other. Sets aren't the kind of thing
that can possibly change.
Pat
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC 40 South Alcaniz St. Pensacola FL 32502 http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class, Godfrey Rust |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class, John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class, Pat Hayes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |