Randall, (01)
The pertinent statements relating to what we are discussing here (all
posted on the Ontolog WikiHomePage) include: (02)
1. "This is the ONTOLOG Community Wiki, an integral part of its
Collaborative Work Environment ("CWE"). The wiki is intended for use
by trusted team and community members of Projects and Communities of
Practice (CoP's) for collaborative documentation."
(ref: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid9 ) (03)
2. "Members ...
# please ensure that your posts are relevant (to our Community
Charter), and that it complies with our IPR Policy.
# please also make sure any commercial- or self-promotion material or
reference are strictly limited to one's namesake page or a short
signature block, and nowhere else as far as our open collaborative
work environment is concerned. ... "
(ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1U ) (04)
3. Then, of course, our Charter
(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nidB ) and our
IPR Policy (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32
) (05)
By the way, our open collaborative work environment includes our
archived e-mail forum, the OntologWiki and shared-file repository. (06)
Hope you find that adequate. If not, kindly suggest what else need to
be added to ensure we stay focused. (07)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (08)
On 9/17/07, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2007 16:31, Peter Yim wrote:
> > Randall,
> >
> > On 9/17/07, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > On Monday 17 September 2007 15:44, Peter Yim wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32
> > >
> > >From reading this, I see nothing that precludes the discussion of
> > > entirely closed-source, commercial or otherwise proprietary
> > > software. It says only that "contributions to the forum by its ...
> > > membership shall have been made under an open ... license."
> > >
> > > If the intent is that no discussion of non-open software take
> > > place, then the wording of this Policy should be changed. As it
> > > stands, I understand it to refer to the contributions made on this
> > > list.
> > >
> > > If the intent is simply to prohibit promotion of non-open software
> > > (leaving open the discussion of its technical merits or lack
> > > thereof), then that should be stated.
> > >
> > > > Regards. =ppy
> > >
> > > Randall Schulz
> >
> >
> > Please refer also to:
> <http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2007-02/msg00234.html#nid02>
>
> I don't see how that answers my question. Can you clarify or expand the
> statements on the Ontolog Wiki so that they clearly prohibit the kind
> of post you don't want to see, 'cause as it stands, it doesn't preclude
> posts that mention, describe or even promote a non-open piece of
> software.
>
>
> Randall Schulz
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (010)
|