On Monday 17 September 2007 16:31, Peter Yim wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Peter,
> > On Monday 17 September 2007 15:44, Peter Yim wrote:
> > > ...
> > > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32
> >From reading this, I see nothing that precludes the discussion of
> > entirely closed-source, commercial or otherwise proprietary
> > software. It says only that "contributions to the forum by its ...
> > membership shall have been made under an open ... license."
> > If the intent is that no discussion of non-open software take
> > place, then the wording of this Policy should be changed. As it
> > stands, I understand it to refer to the contributions made on this
> > list.
> > If the intent is simply to prohibit promotion of non-open software
> > (leaving open the discussion of its technical merits or lack
> > thereof), then that should be stated.
> > > Regards. =ppy
> > Randall Schulz
> Please refer also to:
I don't see how that answers my question. Can you clarify or expand the
statements on the Ontolog Wiki so that they clearly prohibit the kind
of post you don't want to see, 'cause as it stands, it doesn't preclude
posts that mention, describe or even promote a non-open piece of
Randall Schulz (03)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)