ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Logic As Formal Semiotic

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Semantic Web Forum <semantic-web@xxxxxx>, Arisbe <arisbe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Inquiry <inquiry@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jenny ure <jure2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:03:04 +0100
Message-id: <46B0BCC8.6070405@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
JAwbrey
What is truth?  It's a property of a sign, or a representation,
that makes it a good sign, a representation that is so natured
or so designed as to further the achievement its proper object.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In a  recent discussion on spatio-temporal representations of  'apparently' straightforward realworld concepts such as the difference between a river and a lake in GIS, the  environmentalists, the geographers, the fishermen, the freshwater biologists used very different criteria reflecting fact that the 'proper object' they sought to achieve were not the same.

However…the Ordnance Survey team will make a choice
We will then all adopt and use it as a given when the maps come out.
It will then become so embedded in a range of other processes that will make it well nigh impossible to coordinate activities without reinforcing it as a benchmark.

Like the aboriginal songlines we do appear to create and recreate many aspects of the ‘real’ world by validating and enacting those we agree on.

Peirce said that: The opinion which is fated to be ultimately agreed to by all who investigate, is what we mean by the truth, and the object represented in this opinion is the real. Perhaps over-egging the pudding a little but think there is something to it!



Jon Awbrey wrote:
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

LAFS.  Note 3

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

Peirce continues a classical line of calling logic a normative science,
a science of how we ought to do things of we want to achieve a certain
class of objectives.  This makes logic, whose object is truth, akin to
aesthetics, whose object is beauty, pleasure, or experiential goodness,
and ethics, whose object is virtue, justice, or comportmental goodness.

What is the good of logic?  The classical answer is "truth".

What is truth?  It's a property of a sign, or a representation,
that makes it a good sign, a representation that is so natured
or so designed as to further the achievement its proper object.

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-User_talk:Jon_Awbrey
zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey
wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 

  


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>