[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Two ontologies that are inconsistent but both needed

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx>
From: Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:18:44 -0500
Message-id: <0E5F3526-B3A5-4670-B362-48999FE6184B@xxxxxxxx>
On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey wrote:
>> ... the suggestion that all useful ontological reasoning is
>> probabilistic reflects a narrow and misleading perspective.
> I don't believe that and never meant to suggest it.    (01)

Ok, whatever, but that "foundation of sand" stuff sure sounded like it.    (02)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (03)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>