To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Deborah MacPherson" <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 2 May 2007 12:42:37 -0400 |
Message-id: | <48f213f30705020942v69a1870ch8ac59f4eef87746a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Patrick and John - I'm interested in both beauty and formality and see them as complimentary. To clarify, I am not looking for an example as direct as A become B or talking about religion in particular - more interested in dynamic models of information changing its perceived accuracy and value. May I refer you to the map " History Flow Visualization of the Wikipedia Entry on Evolution" by M. Wattenberg and F. Viegas in the 2nd iteration of Places & Spaces at the New York Public Library last year. What grabbed my attention with Johns example before and also a few weeks ago with scientific ideas falling in and out of favor - even being systematically blocked - are the implications for digital preservation and accurate search results today. I'm working on drawings with an informal specification for recording the ways any type of information from a piece of data to entire trends of thought can be assumed to be correct one minute and proven wrong the next. How can recycling versus "throwing in the trash forever" processes be used to keep compressed, remote, record copies of old ideas while (at least appearing to) remove outdated or just plain wrong information from current resources? Particularly interested in publicly accessible information online. Should your proposed logical specification of terms be its own page within the wiki? Would any one be interested in working on showing dynamic terms to and from various topics so particular areas could be also used to confirm talking about the same thing? Debbie -- ************************************************* Deborah L. MacPherson Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics ************************************************** On 5/2/07, Cassidy, Patrick J. <pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Topic maps and the "wheel" of "logical semantics": was Re: {Disarmed} Re: OWL and lack of identifiers, Cassidy, Patrick J. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, Cassidy, Patrick J. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, Waclaw Kusnierczyk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |