ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] spinning-off the volume traffic from the generaldisc

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter F Brown" <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:34:36 +0100
Message-id: <1B2253B0359130439EA571FF30251AAE025662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Peter,    (01)

1. I'd support the idea of [ontolog-engineering] as a split off from the
more general [ontolog-forum] "public" list (cf W3C, as Pat highlighted)
but maybe also [ontolog-concepts] or similar - to make a distinction in
some of the debates we've seen between "what do we mean by...?" and "how
do we get it done...?"    (02)

2. I'd subscribe to both: my problem how to filter the traffic...    (03)

Regards,    (04)

Peter    (05)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter P.
Yim
Sent: 21 March 2007 19:56
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: [ontolog-forum] spinning-off the volume traffic from the
generaldiscussion list    (06)

I have been seeing a higher level of "unsubscriptions" from the 
[ontolog-forum] lately. ... my gut feel is that this volume of 
traffic is not for everyone (and that may be one of the key causes).    (07)

I appreciate the ongoing discussion and would trade anything for 
it! I just wanted to thank everyone here (on behalf of the 
community) for these valuable contributions; please continue the 
discussion, by all means.    (08)

I think we need to do something, though.    (09)

One idea that might work (and give us the best of all worlds) is 
to spin off the high volume traffic to another list ... while 
leaving [ontolog-forum] as the community's "general discussion" 
list, and the subscription to it as a marker for whether a person 
is a member of this community.    (010)

AA. If we do that (spin-off a new list), I would like to find out:    (011)

1. what would be a good name for this new list.    (012)

2. who would want to be immediately subscribed to this new list.    (013)

BB. the above, obviously, is only one of many possible solutions. 
I invite more ideas, suggestions and comments. We will have an 
item on tomorrow's call agenda too (ref: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2007_03_22 
agenda item 8c.) If you are not planning to be at the call (or 
even if you are), please try to post your thoughts to this thread 
(today).    (014)

Thanks & regards.  =ppy
--    (015)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (016)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (017)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>