[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] The Relation Between Logic and Ontology in Metaphysi

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:46:20 -0800
Message-id: <af8f58ac0703160946y56025714n52be555607e7f17d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 16 Mar 2007 10:44:22 -0500, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> but THIS FORUM is centrally
> concerned with "ontology" in one, rather
> technical, sense: the one quoted in your (d)
> above; which, as Chris M has pointed out, is a
> definition which THIS FORUM has formally adopted
> as its working definition.    (01)

[ppy]   Thanks, Pat.  Just as a point of clarification ...    (02)

Chris Menzel alluded to a definition (ref:
) that was only a *proposed* working definition from Michael
Gruninger.    (03)

The set of definition that this forum has managed to *adopt* so far,
goes back to Leo Obrst's "What is an Ontology?" talks in Jan-2006 -
see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_01_12#nidOHT    (04)

The good news is Leo and Michael are now working together to help get
us towards a "framework", that would allow us to deliver the Summit
objective of "Ontology, Taxonomy, Folksonomy: Understanding the
Distinctions."    (05)

Once again, I solicit everyone's input to help us get there. (I'll be
releasing a survey shortly, and I hope we hear back from you all.)    (06)

Thanks & regards.  =ppy
--    (07)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>