Paola, (01)
That would be useful: (02)
> if your analysis is right, then there will be no problem in using CLCE
> in chinese, which is what triggered this inquiry in the first place
> I think we may want to start to work on some experiments using CLCE
> with different languages, this should provide some proof that logic is
> logic in any language (03)
But I would just add that the "E" in CLCE stands for English. (04)
We should consider CLCC for Chinese, CLCJ for Japanese,
CLCS for Spanish, etc. (05)
> Let me clarify that by 'chinese logic' I intend traditional,
> classic chinese logic as contained in original texts, and
> not communist or westernised logic (06)
The "logic" in any book of any kind is somebody's theory
about how people can, do, or should reason. Nobody really
has a good theory about how people actually reason. That's
still a major research question. (07)
> I make my first trip to China. (08)
Have a good trip, (09)
John (010)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (011)
|