To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:56:30 -0600 |
Message-id: | <200701311956.30659.cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> |
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 17:44, Chris Menzel wrote: > (And isn't the possibility of > isomorphic models always ruled out for first-order ontologies simply by the > Loewenheim-Skolem theorem?) (01) What I meant here, of course, is the possibility that all models of the ontology are isomorphic. But now I think what you meant is simply the idea that every model of the ontology turn out to be isomorphic to one of the intended models. This could obviously turn out to be the case so long as one simply defines one's class of intended models broadly enough. (02) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (03) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological correctness, Jakub Kotowski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Visual Complexity, paola . dimaio |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological correctness, Jakub Kotowski |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Visual Complexity, matthew.west |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |