Nicely framed questions, Leo. Thanks.
We definitely need to find out how everyone feel about this. (01)
Let me try to build a web form to capture everybody's responses to
facilitate further analysis. (02)
-ppy (03)
P.S. For those who are already writing up your responses, don't stop.
(We can always re-post that into the form later. :-))
-- (04)
Leo Obrst wrote Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:19:37 -0500:
>
> All,
>
> We are considering one possibility for our site: an ontology repository,
> wherein folks can register ontologies and/or build ontologies using
> Web-enabled tools, possibly hosted at our site.
>
> So some questions:
> 1) How do you feel about:
> a) our site supporting an ontology repository?
> b) our site supporting a Web-enabled ontology tool (for developing
> ontologies)?
> c) none of the above.
>
> 2) Which ontology tools do you use?
> a) Can you characterize the tools: i.e., Web-enabled, ontology
> languages supported, cost/licensing, POCs, experience, etc.
> b) Do you know of a tool provider who might support such a public
> effort, hosted on our site?
>
> 3) Which ontology languages (knowledge representation languages) should
> be the standard(s) for the ontologies?
> (Some examples: Ontolingua/KIF, Common Logic, OKBC, CycL, RDF/S,
> DAML+OIL, OWL, etc.)
>
> 4) Additional Comments?
>
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
> --
> _____________________________________________
> Dr. Leo Obrst The MITRE Corporation
> mailto:lobrst@xxxxxxxxx Intelligent Information Management/Exploitation
> Voice: 703-883-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S W640
> Fax: 703-883-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
>
>
>
> --
> To post messages mailto:ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
> at http://ontolog.cim3.org/forums/ontolog
> (05)
--
To post messages mailto:ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
at http://ontolog.cim3.org/forums/ontolog (06)
|