| > 
> Let's work this up a little more and try to optimize the
 > precious face-time at Minneapolis.
 >
 Peter,
 We really nead to make sure our meeting in Minneapolis progresses the already defined work.  I am afraid that what you are proposing would significantly impact on that work.  I think you might be better off to have an ontology meeting outside of the Minneapolis meeting, as I am not sure that we can spare the resources..   Mark
 
 > -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx]
 > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:48 AM
 > To: ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx
 > Subject: [ontolog] Agenda for the ontology mini-program at the
 > Minneapolis F2F Meeting
 >
 >
 > 1. Ref my earlier proposal,
 > (see http://ubl.cim3.org/lists/ubl-ontolog/0205/msg00001.html#nid04)
 > I suggested a 3 part mini-program, to which Tim proposed a
 > fourth piece (see 4 below) --
 >
 >          (1)  A plenary, with
 >              (a)  a tutorial on ontology & ontological
 > engineering -- to be given by Leo Obrst
 >              (b)  followed by Q&A and very high level
 > discussions of where this can lead us
 >
 >          (2)  Three separate sessions with individual sub-committees
 >              (a)  with Library Content SC
 >              (b)  with Naming & Design Rules SC
 >              (c)  with Context Methodology & Context Driver SCs
 >
 >          (3)  A gathering of a sub-group of UBL members who
 > are interested in pursuing this further
 > to
 >              (a)  brainstorm and to map out what should be done
 >              (b)  discuss how we should approach and continue
 > this work,
 >              (c)  get organized (propose forming an SC;
 > appointing a liaison; ...etc.), and
 >              (d)  make formal proposals on institutionalizing
 > continuing activities.
 >
 >          (4)  develop examples of ontological analysis as
 > applied to UBL semantics.
 >
 > 2. Through iterative discussions, the time/participation
 > allocated to this activity at Minneapolis
 > will effectively be --
 >
 >    (i)    a 1.5-hour working lunch session on day-1 (Mon
 > 03-Jun-02) with the entire UBL membership,
 >
 >    (ii)   say, 1 hour, within the day-2 morning (9:00-12:00)
 > session with the LCSC, during which
 > time, Tim-lcsc has planned to cover "UDEF/ontology/controlled
 > vocabulary/context drivers".
 >    (iii)  a 1-1.5 hour day-2 lunch session of members who
 > have indicated their interest in pursuing
 > the ontological discussion/work.
 >    (iv)  possibly some time to present relevant issues during
 > the joint LCSC-NDRSC session during
 > the afternoon of day-2.
 >    (v)   continued work in developing examples of ontological
 > analysis as applied to UBL semantics
 > within LCSC during days-3 & -4
 >    (vi)  Day-5 9:30 - 10:00 (Fri 07-Jun-02) pre-closing
 > plenary presentation of onotological
 > analysis as applied to UBL.
 >
 > 3. Due to other unavoidable conflicts, both Leo and myself
 > (Peter Yim) will only be attending the
 > F2F on Monday & Tuesday (6/3~4/02). We'll be there full-day
 > on both days, though.
 >
 > 4. Therefore, my proposed draft agenda, given the circumstances, is --
 >
 >     (i)   do 1 (a+b), and even some 2 (b+c) during the day-1
 > lunch session,
 >     (ii)  do 2(a) during day-2 morning,
 >     (iii) do 3(a+b+c) during day-2 lunch,
 >     (iv) do more 2(b+c) if necessay during day-2 afternoon,
 >     (v)  do 4 during day-3 & day-4.
 >     (vi) do a presentation of the week's work & 3(d) during
 > the day-5 morning session.
 >
 > 5. I've also requested with Tim, earlier, for phone
 > conferencing facilities, so that interested
 > parties who cannot be at Minneapolis can also join us.
 > Thanks & regards,
 > PPY
 > --
 >
 >
 > --
 > An archive of the [ubl-ontolog] postings can be found
 > at http://ubl.cim3.org/lists/ubl-ontolog/
 >
 |