ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontolog] Agenda for the ontology mini-program at the Minneap olis F

To: ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx
From: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 17:53:02 -0400
Message-id: <3A967FE7B99E134C9FE65E2C136560300A37FB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Let's work this up a little more and try to optimize the
> precious face-time at Minneapolis.
>

Peter,

We really nead to make sure our meeting in Minneapolis progresses the already defined work.  I am afraid that what you are proposing would significantly impact on that work.  I think you might be better off to have an ontology meeting outside of the Minneapolis meeting, as I am not sure that we can spare the resources.. 

Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:48 AM
> To: ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ontolog] Agenda for the ontology mini-program at the
> Minneapolis F2F Meeting
>
>
> 1. Ref my earlier proposal,
> (see http://ubl.cim3.org/lists/ubl-ontolog/0205/msg00001.html#nid04)
> I suggested a 3 part mini-program, to which Tim proposed a
> fourth piece (see 4 below) --
>
>          (1)  A plenary, with
>              (a)  a tutorial on ontology & ontological
> engineering -- to be given by Leo Obrst
>              (b)  followed by Q&A and very high level
> discussions of where this can lead us
>
>          (2)  Three separate sessions with individual sub-committees
>              (a)  with Library Content SC
>              (b)  with Naming & Design Rules SC
>              (c)  with Context Methodology & Context Driver SCs
>
>          (3)  A gathering of a sub-group of UBL members who
> are interested in pursuing this further
> to
>              (a)  brainstorm and to map out what should be done
>              (b)  discuss how we should approach and continue
> this work,
>              (c)  get organized (propose forming an SC;
> appointing a liaison; ...etc.), and
>              (d)  make formal proposals on institutionalizing
> continuing activities.
>
>          (4)  develop examples of ontological analysis as
> applied to UBL semantics.
>
> 2. Through iterative discussions, the time/participation
> allocated to this activity at Minneapolis
> will effectively be --
>
>    (i)    a 1.5-hour working lunch session on day-1 (Mon
> 03-Jun-02) with the entire UBL membership,
>
>    (ii)   say, 1 hour, within the day-2 morning (9:00-12:00)
> session with the LCSC, during which
> time, Tim-lcsc has planned to cover "UDEF/ontology/controlled
> vocabulary/context drivers".
>    (iii)  a 1-1.5 hour day-2 lunch session of members who
> have indicated their interest in pursuing
> the ontological discussion/work.
>    (iv)  possibly some time to present relevant issues during
> the joint LCSC-NDRSC session during
> the afternoon of day-2.
>    (v)   continued work in developing examples of ontological
> analysis as applied to UBL semantics
> within LCSC during days-3 & -4
>    (vi)  Day-5 9:30 - 10:00 (Fri 07-Jun-02) pre-closing
> plenary presentation of onotological
> analysis as applied to UBL.
>
> 3. Due to other unavoidable conflicts, both Leo and myself
> (Peter Yim) will only be attending the
> F2F on Monday & Tuesday (6/3~4/02). We'll be there full-day
> on both days, though.
>
> 4. Therefore, my proposed draft agenda, given the circumstances, is --
>
>     (i)   do 1 (a+b), and even some 2 (b+c) during the day-1
> lunch session,
>     (ii)  do 2(a) during day-2 morning,
>     (iii) do 3(a+b+c) during day-2 lunch,
>     (iv) do more 2(b+c) if necessay during day-2 afternoon,
>     (v)  do 4 during day-3 & day-4.
>     (vi) do a presentation of the week's work & 3(d) during
> the day-5 morning session.
>
> 5. I've also requested with Tim, earlier, for phone
> conferencing facilities, so that interested
> parties who cannot be at Minneapolis can also join us.
> Thanks & regards,
> PPY
> --
>
>
> --
> An archive of the [ubl-ontolog] postings can be found
> at http://ubl.cim3.org/lists/ubl-ontolog/
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>