Understand. A monday lunchtime meeting is quite different
than the extensive agenda I was responding to.
From: Tim McGrath
Cc: ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx; Jon.Bosak@xxxxxxx
Sent: 5/25/2002 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog] Agenda for the ontology mini-program
at the Minneapolis F2F Meeting
This subgroup was formed out of a request from the library
in the interest of identifying the role of ontological engineering
We have set aside monday lunchtime for a presentation
from Leo Orbst.
for those interested in developing this, there will also
be a tuesday
lunchtime meeting to work up a UBL position paper for this
report on this group will form part of the LCSC report to
We are trying not to interfere with other UBL issues,
but there is a
sustained opinion that this work is relevant and of immediate
UBL. we just need some face to face discussion to develop
this to a
point where others can evaluate this position. the proposed
attempts to accomodate this and i do not belive it will
impact on the
other work of UBL teams.
I am confident that we will get value from this and aplogise
if it was
presented as something distractive to the group.
CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:
> Let's work this up a little more and try to optimize
> precious face-time at Minneapolis.
We really nead to make sure our meeting in Minneapolis
already defined work. I am afraid that what you are proposing
significantly impact on that work. I think you might be
better off to
have an ontology meeting outside of the Minneapolis meeting,
as I am not
sure that we can spare the resources..
fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142