Tim,
Understand. A monday lunchtime meeting is quite different
than the extensive agenda I was responding to.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath
To: MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx
Cc: ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx; Jon.Bosak@xxxxxxx
Sent: 5/25/2002 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog] Agenda for the ontology mini-program
at the Minneapolis F2F Meeting
This subgroup was formed out of a request from the library
content group
in the interest of identifying the role of ontological engineering
in
our work.
We have set aside monday lunchtime for a presentation
from Leo Orbst.
for those interested in developing this, there will also
be a tuesday
lunchtime meeting to work up a UBL position paper for this
work. a
report on this group will form part of the LCSC report to
the closing
plenary.
We are trying not to interfere with other UBL issues,
but there is a
sustained opinion that this work is relevant and of immediate
benefit to
UBL. we just need some face to face discussion to develop
this to a
point where others can evaluate this position. the proposed
agenda
attempts to accomodate this and i do not belive it will
impact on the
other work of UBL teams.
I am confident that we will get value from this and aplogise
if it was
presented as something distractive to the group.
CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:
>
> Let's work this up a little more and try to optimize
the
> precious face-time at Minneapolis.
>
Peter,
We really nead to make sure our meeting in Minneapolis
progresses the
already defined work. I am afraid that what you are proposing
would
significantly impact on that work. I think you might be
better off to
have an ontology meeting outside of the Minneapolis meeting,
as I am not
sure that we can spare the resources..
Mark
--
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142