[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog] UBL 5/23/2002: UBL Agenda and Registration

To: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <xmlgeek@xxxxxxx>, <ubl-ontolog@xxxxxxxx>, <eve.maler@xxxxxxx>, "Monica Martin" <mmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Monica Martin" <mmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:19:58 -0700
Message-id: <F1FE633BDC5EC54A9E10336D65D09D443F6C3D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I found out today I will not be allowed to travel to Minneapolis.
However, I would like to contribute to the sessions during the week.  If
there is any way there could be a call-in number, it would be greatly

Thank you.
Monica J. Martin
Program Manager
Drake Certivo, Inc.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: CRAWFORD, Mark 
        Sent: Tue 5/21/2002 11:31 AM 
        To: Ubl-Comment (E-mail); Ubl list (E-mail) 
        Subject: [ubl-comment] FW: UBL Agenda and Registration

        High folks.  My private conversations have indicated we can
expect an attendance of 40-50 folks.  Currently there are only 14 folks
registered.  Please submit your registrations soonest (remember advance
registration closes 24 May) to ensure we keep the number and size of
rooms we require.  As a reminder, if you are attending X12, you still
need to register separately for UBL and pay the UBL registration fee
(the same arrangement the eBTWG folks had to do for the X12 Seattle


        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Diane Huber [ mailto:dhuber@xxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:41 AM 
        To: mcrawford@xxxxxxx 
        Subject: UBL Agenda and Registration 

        Hi Mark, 

        We're looking to receive the UBL agenda as soon as you have it.
        there are only 14 attendees registered for the UBL meeting.
This might 
        make a difference in your agenda.  Will you still need 3 meeting
rooms for 
        only a few people.  Those registered are listed below.  Maybe
you can light 
        a match under the others you are expecting to come and get them
to register 
        soon.  I noticed that you haven't registered either.  Thanks. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>