This subgroup was formed out of a request from the library content group in the interest of identifying the role of ontological engineering in our work.
We have set aside monday lunchtime for a presentation from Leo Orbst. for those interested in developing this, there will also be a tuesday lunchtime meeting to work up a UBL position paper for this work. a report on this group will form part of the LCSC report to the closing plenary.
We are trying not to interfere with other UBL issues, but there is a sustained opinion that this work is relevant and of immediate benefit to UBL. we just need some face to face discussion to develop this to a point where others can evaluate this position. the proposed agenda attempts to accomodate this and i do not belive it will impact on the other work of UBL teams.
I am confident that we will get value from this and aplogise if it was presented as something distractive to the group.
CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:
>
> Let's work this up a little more and try to optimize
the
> precious face-time at Minneapolis.
>
Peter,
We really nead to make sure our meeting in Minneapolis
progresses the already defined work. I am afraid that what you are proposing
would significantly impact on that work. I think you might be better off
to have an ontology meeting outside of the Minneapolis meeting, as I am not
sure that we can spare the resources..
Mark
--
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
|