iaoa-education
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [iaoa-education] IAOA Lexicon Project

To: IAOA Education Committee <iaoa-education@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: iaoa-education-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Todd J Schneider <todd.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:49:47 -0400
Message-id: <OF2BFDBF18.CC3193DC-ON85257A75.004BE3A3-85257A75.004BF890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

John,

I think you suggestion for the subcommittee
is excellent. It's more descriptive and explicit.

Todd
+1.571.250.1221 (Fixed)
+1.703.655.8826 (Mobile)

22260 Pacific Blvd.
Building 60, Suite 500
Sterling, VA 20166
 
This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive mail for the addressee), you should not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in this message.  

If you have received this message in error, please so advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message.  
Thank you for your cooperation.


Inactive hide details for John Bateman ---09/08/2012 03:20:42 PM---Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLISJohn Bateman ---09/08/2012 03:20:42 PM---Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS: > But might there be some focus on com

From: John Bateman <bateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS" <z_californianus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IAOA Education Committee <iaoa-education@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/08/2012 03:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iaoa-education] IAOA Lexicon Project
Sent by: iaoa-education-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS:
> But might there be some focus on communication? How about "Subcommittee for discourse standards"?

ouch! I think that that
unfortunately raises so many different connotations
and mis-directions that it is even worse than 'lexicon'.
(And there are already discourse standards, in ISO even... but
not the sort that are meant here). I think 'terminology'
is still about the most neutral suggestion so far and the very reason
for having terminology agreements is to foster
communication, so that might probably
be considered already entailed.

How about:

  Subcommitee for Ontology Terminology

Might be a bit clearer and more accurately reflect the scope?

John B.

_____________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/   
Committee File-share:
http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/ 
Committee Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog:
http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org
IAOA website:
http://iaoa.org


_____________________________________________________________________ 
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/   
Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/ 
Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org 
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>