|
John, Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS: > But might there be some focus on communication? How about "Subcommittee for discourse standards"? ouch! I think that that unfortunately raises so many different connotations and mis-directions that it is even worse than 'lexicon'. (And there are already discourse standards, in ISO even... but not the sort that are meant here). I think 'terminology' is still about the most neutral suggestion so far and the very reason for having terminology agreements is to foster communication, so that might probably be considered already entailed. How about: Subcommitee for Ontology Terminology Might be a bit clearer and more accurately reflect the scope? John B. _____________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/ Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/ Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!) To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org IAOA website: http://iaoa.org _____________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/ Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/ Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!) To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org IAOA website: http://iaoa.org (01) |
John Bateman ---09/08/2012 03:20:42 PM---Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS: > But might there be some focus on com