Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS:
> But might there be some focus on communication? How about "Subcommittee for
>discourse standards"? (01)
ouch! I think that that
unfortunately raises so many different connotations
and mis-directions that it is even worse than 'lexicon'.
(And there are already discourse standards, in ISO even... but
not the sort that are meant here). I think 'terminology'
is still about the most neutral suggestion so far and the very reason
for having terminology agreements is to foster
communication, so that might probably
be considered already entailed. (02)
How about: (03)
Subcommitee for Ontology Terminology (04)
Might be a bit clearer and more accurately reflect the scope? (05)
John B. (06)
_____________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/
Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/
Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org (07)
|