Le 08/09/2012 21:20, John Bateman a écrit :
> Am 08.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS:
>> But might there be some focus on communication? How about "Subcommittee for
>discourse standards"?
> ouch! I think that that
> unfortunately raises so many different connotations
> and mis-directions that it is even worse than 'lexicon'.
> (And there are already discourse standards, in ISO even... but
> not the sort that are meant here). I think 'terminology'
> is still about the most neutral suggestion so far and the very reason
> for having terminology agreements is to foster
> communication, so that might probably
> be considered already entailed.
>
> How about:
>
> Subcommitee for Ontology Terminology
>
> Might be a bit clearer and more accurately reflect the scope?
>
> John B.
>
Hi,
I fully agree with that proposition covering both ontologies and
terminolgy with a linguistic color.
Regards.
Richard (01)
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/
> Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/
> Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
> Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
> To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org
> IAOA website: http://iaoa.org (02)
richard_dapoigny.vcf
Description: Vcard
_____________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/
Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/
Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org (01)
|