Gunther, Chris (Chute), (01)
Good. Thanks for the clarifications. I am happy to proceed on the basis that
I
had misinterpreted those T&C words which had struck me so as a consciously and
firmly closed door, so blocking of the spirit of openness and readiness for
change (though respect for legacies...) you correctly expect of this group. (02)
Best wishes,
Christopher (03)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gunther Schadow" <gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "uom-ontology-std" <uom-ontology-std@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [uom-ontology-std] An UoM Ontology based on UCUM v1.6 (04)
I doubt neither you nor I have misunderstood anything. I find
a discussion on whether the terms are "dictatorial" or not, and
"unnecessary" or not entirely out of scope of a discussion that
should be or need to be had here. (05)
The debate should be altogether technical. (06)
The question is not "if is UCUM is to be a kind of ingredient in
the brew ahead", but in which *additional* brew ahead. (07)
And I am sure the majority of brewers brewing this brew here like
to focus on content. (08)
There should be debates on content. Then, if that debate on content
brings forth a motivation, there will be an agreement on the
legalese. But there will not be a debate on UCUM's legalese here. (09)
regards,
-Gunther (010)
Christopher Spottiswoode wrote:
> Oh dear! May I assure you, Gunther, that my expression of astonishment
> ("Wow!")
> followed by a direct quote and two questions was not meant as a rant? I am
> sorry that you have taken it as one. A stimulus? - yes!
>
> Perhaps you could start by telling us where I might have misinterpreted the
> T&C
> as they appear, or how they might be read or applied differently? They do
> come
> across to me as unrealistically dictatorial, despite their understandable best
> of intentions.
>
> Certainly, if UCUM is to be a kind of ingredient in the brew ahead, there
> should
> be a debate on the matter, or at least some clarification of what they really
> mean.
>
> Best regards,
> Christopher (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (012)
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4273 (20090724) __________ (013)
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. (014)
http://www.eset.com (015)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (016)
|