On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Gunther Schadow wrote: (01)
> I doubt neither you nor I have misunderstood anything. I find
> a discussion on whether the terms are "dictatorial" or not, and
> "unnecessary" or not entirely out of scope of a discussion that
> should be or need to be had here.
>
> The debate should be altogether technical.
>
> The question is not "if is UCUM is to be a kind of ingredient in
> the brew ahead", but in which *additional* brew ahead.
>
> And I am sure the majority of brewers brewing this brew here like
> to focus on content.
>
> There should be debates on content. Then, if that debate on content
> brings forth a motivation, there will be an agreement on the
> legalese. But there will not be a debate on UCUM's legalese here.
> (02)
Your tone is completely inappropriate and somewhat offensive. You do
not have either the authority or the stature to dictate to an open
forum what it should or should not be discussing. There will be debate
here on whatever topic the participants, here, wish to discuss. You
are free to participate or not, as you choose. (03)
Pat Hayes (04)
> regards,
> -Gunther
>
> Christopher Spottiswoode wrote:
>> Oh dear! May I assure you, Gunther, that my expression of
>> astonishment ("Wow!")
>> followed by a direct quote and two questions was not meant as a
>> rant? I am
>> sorry that you have taken it as one. A stimulus? - yes!
>>
>> Perhaps you could start by telling us where I might have
>> misinterpreted the T&C
>> as they appear, or how they might be read or applied differently?
>> They do come
>> across to me as unrealistically dictatorial, despite their
>> understandable best
>> of intentions.
>>
>> Certainly, if UCUM is to be a kind of ingredient in the brew ahead,
>> there should
>> be a debate on the matter, or at least some clarification of what
>> they really
>> mean.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Christopher
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
> Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard
>
>
> (05)
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (07)
|