[ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not share
or forward message without consent from the team! *** ] (01)
I incorporated the changes to the annual plans. Peter Yim already gave me
material describing the Ontology Summit 2008. (01)
I changed to the Arial font at 10 point, and the description easily fits
into the 7 page limit. In fact, there is a little bit of space available
if we want to add any additional material. The latest description is
attached. (02)
-- Ken (03)
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Michelle Raymond wrote: (04)
>
> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>
> Ken,
>
> Two comments:
>
> 1) It is not required that the DataNet Partner be fully
> self-sustaining within the first five years. A second round of
> funding may be available to transition. Of course, it is good to get
> as self-sustaining as possible; but, it would not be good to do so at
> the expense of research.
>
> 2) The Ontology Summit 2008 Communique hasn't been in a publication,
> but perhaps could be referenced within the document.
>
> Suggestion for addressing 1):
> Year 1: Gathering of requirements from the initial communities being
> targeted by the OOR.
> Development of APIs and planning for adaptation and integration of the
> existing ontology
> repository platforms. Frontier research start up in areas defined by
> vision. Education
> and outreach programs are limited to selected subcommunities.
> ? Year 2: Completion of the first release of the OOR platform. Initial
> delivery of OOR services
> to the targeted communities. Feedback from the communities will be
> gathered for use in the
> next phase. Planning begins for the second release. Frontier research
> focus on DataNet
> infrastructure enablers.
> Education and outreach programs expand but remain within the targeted
> communities.
> ? Year 3: Development of the second release begins, based on lessons
> learned. Education and
> outreach programs expand beyond the targeted communities to other
> DataNet partners. Delivery
> of OOR services to additional research communities. Frontier research
> focus on community
> interaction enablers. Framework for incorporating research results designed.
> ? Year 4: Second release of the OOR platform. Education and outreach
> expands to include
> commercial and industrial communities. Transition to self-sustaining
> OOR begins with planning
> for the organization structure. Frontier research expansion
> encouraged. Framework for incorporating
> research results integrated into the OOR.
> ? Year 5: Transition toward fully self-sustaining mode. Frontier
> research expansion continues and
> framework for incorporating results back into OOR exercised. Education
> and outreach are now the
> primary role played by the project.
>
>
>
> Suggestion for addressing 2): Annually the Ontolog Forum hosts an
> Ontology Summit, which makes a statement appropriate to each Summit's
> theme as part of our general advocacy designed to bring ontology
> science and engineering into the mainstream. The theme for 2008 is
> "Towards an Open Ontology Repository". This resulting communiqué
> represents the joint position of those who were engaged in the year's
> summit discourse on an Open Ontology Repository (OOR) and of over 60
> endorsements from around the world. Leo Obrst and Mark Musen were
> lead editors for the 2008 Communique which can be found at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2008_Communique
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michelle Raymond
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Ken Baclawski <kenb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>>
>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Michelle Raymond wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>>>
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> Wow, nice work. What time does this need to be time-stamped tomorrow?
>>
>> COB.
>>
>>> How fine-of-a-toothed comb do we need for review to have a reasonable
>>> assurance of getting a request for full proposal?
>>
>> We should focus on covering the requirements as well as possible in the
>> project description.
>>
>>> I'm torn between reading this now and checking in with the cheering
>>> neighbors in the street.
>>
>> Enjoy,
>>
>> -- Ken
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
>> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
> (05)
description.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601 (01)
|