To: | Ontology Summit 2014 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Victor Chernov <vchernov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:53:18 +0400 |
Message-id: | <126111592.20140428135118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Peter, We used the following licensees: Virtuoso: GNU General Public License. Stardog: Stardog Community License. NitrosBase: NitrosBase Non-Commercial End-User License. The licenses for the products we used are attached here. Regards, Victor mailto:vchernov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ===================== 26.04.2014, 18:45:57: ===================== Thank you very much for highlighting this potential issue, Mike. Yes, our prevailing Open IPR Policy and practice do apply to contributions during the Ontology Summit process - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32 We do, on occasions and prior to the event, grant waivers, in the interest of providing a broad exposure of the state-of-the-art to the community by inviting the participation and presentation of proprietary material. To help clarify whether we are still in conformance to this Open IPR practice, maybe VictorChernov can help us by listing the IPR owners and Applicable Use License of the various products involved in your hackathon project. (In case some of them turn out to be proprietary, at least we should retroactively apply and clearly indicate the appropriate "waiver.") Thanks & regards. =ppy -- On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Mike Bergman <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since my first exposure to the Ontolog Forum, Peter in particular has > been an active steward to keep discussions clear of any proprietary or > product-oriented discussions. > > The "hackathons" appear to me to be an backdoor way to promote and > discuss certain tools and products in a less than transparent way, and > in violation (as I understand it) of the forum's neutrality on such > matters. One could say anyone could participate in these hackathons, but > the choice of timing, topic, lead and so forth also can effectively > penalize any vendor that has not the time, direct interest or window to > participate. > > I really have no idea what is exactly going on with this specific > activity, but I am really quite bothered by what I perceive to be a > biased and parochial tone. To my mind, there is clearly a conflict of > interest in a specific vendor writing reports under the guise and > implied endorsement of the forum. > > I encourage the forum to re-think how it is handling these matters. > > On 4/25/2014 10:10 AM, Victor Chernov wrote: >> We modified the report. The following important notes added: >> /Virtuoso and Stardog representatives expressed their disagreement with >> our results. >> According to Virtuoso opinion it was necessary to configure their >> triplestore before the experiments. Unfortunately there were no >> participants from Virtuoso. Configuring Virtuoso without them would be >> time consuming, we have experimented with the default settings. >> For Stardog we could not adjust the Native API without presence of >> Stardog developers, and had to use dotNetRDF that works through HTTP. >> Strictly speaking that does not meet the announced topic of the research. >> In view of the above, we present only the results NitrosBase. >> Nevertheless, the results of Virtuoso and Stardog were used by >> participants in the discussion as an additional confirmation of >> ontological database performance problems. >> /The report can be downloaded from >> http://nitrosbase.com/wp-content/uploads/OptimizedSPARQLreportV12.zip >> Regards, >> Victor >> mailto:vchernov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Stardog COMMUNITY_LICENSE.txt
Virtuoso LICENSE.txt
NitrosBaseRDF EULA - Non-commercial.pdf _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Reminder: Ontology Summit 2014 Symposium - last chance to reserve blocked hotel rooms, Michael F Uschold |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2014 Hackathon - Optimized SPARQL performance management via native API Status report (Post-event updates), Peter Yim |
Previous by Thread: | [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2014 Hackathon - Optimized SPARQL performance management via native API Status report (Post-event updates), Victor Chernov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2014 Hackathon - Optimized SPARQL performance management via native API Status report (Post-event updates), Peter Yim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |