I agree John. Treat them all as data sources. Leave as much as possible in its
native format and build logics on top. Some domains allow for more controlled
vocabularies/models, others do not. Successful implementations recognize this
and are built accordingly. (01)
Eric Little, PhD
Director, Information Mgmt
Orbis Technologies, Inc.
1255 City View Center
Oviedo, FL. 32765
Cell: 321-480-4818 (02)
On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:02 AM, "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (03)
> On 3/2/2012 8:38 PM, Obrst, Leo J. wrote:
>> Generally, religious wars over MY knowledge representation language
>> and YOUR knowledge representation language are a waste of time and energy,
>> and lead to hard feelings and enemy camps.
> I very strongly agree.
> My recommended policy is to integrate and support *everything* --
> and the only systems I complain about are the ones that force
> a fixed, one-size-fits-all paradigm on everything.
> As I've said before, the *worst* feature of the Semantic Web
> is the word 'Web'. What we need are Semantic *Systems* that
> accommodate everything and anything.
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (05)